1996
DOI: 10.1080/0022062960280102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Romantic Ideologies, Educational Practices, and Institutional Formations of English

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Approaches to teaching that facilitate active, student-directed learning and enjoyment anticipate later twentieth century pedagogical models, particularly the “workshop” model that came to the fore in English education during the late 1970s and early 1980s (Reid, 1996). Indeed, the 1999 English syllabus is underpinned by the assumption that students are active participants in constructing meaning and developing their cognitive, aesthetic, imaginative and critical capacities through immersion in language and texts:Meaning is central to the study of English.…”
Section: Continuities In English Discourses and Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Approaches to teaching that facilitate active, student-directed learning and enjoyment anticipate later twentieth century pedagogical models, particularly the “workshop” model that came to the fore in English education during the late 1970s and early 1980s (Reid, 1996). Indeed, the 1999 English syllabus is underpinned by the assumption that students are active participants in constructing meaning and developing their cognitive, aesthetic, imaginative and critical capacities through immersion in language and texts:Meaning is central to the study of English.…”
Section: Continuities In English Discourses and Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. See Ball (1982, 1985); Ball et al (1990); Ball and Lacey (1995); Barcan (1988); Brock (1982a, b, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1987, 1996); Carter (2012); Cormack (2003, 2008,); Goodson and Medway (1990); Green and Beavis (1996); Manuel (2002); Manuel and Brock (2003); Mathieson (1975); Michaels (2001); Reid (1996, 2002, 2003); Rosser (2000); Sawyer (2002, 2004, 2009a, b); Selleck (1968); Shayer (1972).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do this, I seek to re-illuminate the educational ideas of the German philosopher, psychologist and educationalist Johann Friedrich Herbart, which have been relegated to the recesses of curriculum history by lines of inquiry in English education that focus on a variety of specific emphases in the formation of the subject in schools. These emphases include the influence of Romantic ideologies and beliefs about the value of imaginative literature in the English subject (Mathieson, 1975;Reid, 2004Reid, , 2002Reid, , 1996Shayer, 1972); the role of universities in the institutionalisation of English in schools (Applebee, 1974;Brock, 1987Brock, , 1984Reid, 2004Reid, , 2002Reid, , 1996Shayer, 1972); the multitude of social, economic, political and cultural factors influencing curriculum, with an emphasis on tracing the history of the English subject (1990, p. 231) detects a "formidable ignorance of our history". Both views are especially significant for our understandings of the English subject in that for many teachers, the philosophical bases of their classroom practices are perhaps not fully comprehended: "what is lost to a profession ignorant of its own history is the weave of ideology in the discourse of English studies" (1990, p. 231).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%