2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Romania disparities in regional development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The political and economic changes at the beginning of the 1990s have brought about considerable changes in the spatial structure of Romania. The processes of economic privatisation, industrial restructuring, suburbanisation and out-migration have contributed substantially to the restructuring of the Romanian economic space [1], [2], [3], marked by increasing spatial, and socio-economic inequalities [4], [5], [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The political and economic changes at the beginning of the 1990s have brought about considerable changes in the spatial structure of Romania. The processes of economic privatisation, industrial restructuring, suburbanisation and out-migration have contributed substantially to the restructuring of the Romanian economic space [1], [2], [3], marked by increasing spatial, and socio-economic inequalities [4], [5], [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…decentralisation, competition, tolerance. On the other hand, in other regions ethnic diversity of Romania is more obvious (Surd, Kassai, & Giurgiu, 2011).…”
Section: Romaniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, comparing different Romanian NUTS II counties, the district of Bucharest-Ilfov emerges as having suffered less socio-economic marginalisation and territorial disparities than Eastern and Southern regions (SURD et al, 2011). This implies a different impact of the financial supports allocated by the European Union before and after the enlargement in 2007, corroborating the hypothesis according to which the poorer a rural area is, the more modest its development will be (GALLUZZO, 2017a;2017b;2018a;2018b;SURD et al, 2011). Therefore, the focus of the National Rural Development Plan on stimulating measures of diversification in farming through agritourism, rural tourism, and the EU's LEADER initiatives, which is financed under the second pillar of the Common Agricultural Policy, represents a good opportunity for rural areas to reduce the socio-economic marginalisation suffered in many deprived contexts, even if the level of GDP per capita remains one of the most significant factors in the mitigation of socio-economic disparities and improving the environmental protection and sustainability of rural territories (BURJA & BURJA, 2014;GALLUZZO, 2017a;2017c;IORIO & CORSALE, 2010;ABRHAM, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Completely different is the issue of temporary emigration, which is sensitive to various parameters such as the context, the village of origin, and other socio-economic variables and expectations that are able to drive the emigration, even if scholars have found that the recent increase specifically in female emigration has notably been met with public strategies tailored to the social protection of several Romanian rural territories (SANDU, 2005a;2005b;2007;PIPERNO, 2012). In general, comparing different Romanian NUTS II counties, the district of Bucharest-Ilfov emerges as having suffered less socio-economic marginalisation and territorial disparities than Eastern and Southern regions (SURD et al, 2011). This implies a different impact of the financial supports allocated by the European Union before and after the enlargement in 2007, corroborating the hypothesis according to which the poorer a rural area is, the more modest its development will be (GALLUZZO, 2017a;2017b;2018a;2018b;SURD et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%