2013
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-092010-153348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roma and Gypsy “Ethnicity” as a Subject of Anthropological Inquiry

Abstract: Anthropological interest in Romany and Gypsy populations is now intense; but for the first seven or so decades of Anthropology, the field was left entirely to amateur folklorists. Roma and Gypsies may often “not want in” ( Gmelch 1986 ), but they also seem not to fit into existing academic models. Examining various ways in which Romany sociality challenges existing anthropological models, this article assesses the contribution of three explanations of Romany persistence: historical, sociostructural and cultura… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Roma population, being the largest ethnic minority in Europe, has attracted the attention of academics (7). Many researches are done regarding European Roma populations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Roma population, being the largest ethnic minority in Europe, has attracted the attention of academics (7). Many researches are done regarding European Roma populations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a critical analysis of this legacy we draw on what Stewart (2013) refers to as the socio-historical approach to Romani studies. Major contributions are those of Okely (1983), Lucassen (1991), Willems (1997), Cottaar (1998), andMayall (2004).…”
Section: Scholarly Contributions To the Gypsy Legacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…discrimination, racism or outright antigypsyism) (Fraser 1995;Selling et al 2015;Stewart 2012). Many social scientists claim that commonalities among the different Roma subgroups also involve similar ethnically framed ideologies and practices on their own part, albeit for the most part ones closely related to the external pressures mentioned (Gmelch 1986;MacLaughlin 1999;Stewart 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%