2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11249-008-9393-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rolling–Sliding Laboratory Tests of Friction Modifiers in Leaf Contaminated Wheel–Rail Contacts

Abstract: Leaf-related adhesion problems have been present in many railway networks all over the world in the last few decades. Since the early 1970s many measures have been undertaken in order to mitigate the problem. One of the measures adopted by many railway networks is the use of friction modifiers. However, the low adhesion problem still persists. Furthermore, the effectiveness of these friction modifiers has not well proven yet due to the lack of research in controlled conditions. Consequently, the rolling stock … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
87
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
8
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Great Britain during the autumn period (from October to November) numerous incidents, such as "station overruns" and signals passed at danger (SPADS) occur every year which are related to low adhesion conditions [RSSB T1042]. For about half of the incidents an autumn leaf contamination has been reported [RSSB T1042] which is known to cause low adhesion [Cann 2006, Oloffson 2004, Arias-Cuevas 2010, Li 2009, GallardoHernandez 2008. A proportion of the other half were related to small amounts of water on the rail head caused by prevailing environmental conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Great Britain during the autumn period (from October to November) numerous incidents, such as "station overruns" and signals passed at danger (SPADS) occur every year which are related to low adhesion conditions [RSSB T1042]. For about half of the incidents an autumn leaf contamination has been reported [RSSB T1042] which is known to cause low adhesion [Cann 2006, Oloffson 2004, Arias-Cuevas 2010, Li 2009, GallardoHernandez 2008. A proportion of the other half were related to small amounts of water on the rail head caused by prevailing environmental conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If oil and water are present together (regardless of amount), oil has the dominating effect and adhesion coefficient remains at low levels similar to having oil alone [21]. At present, many friction modifiers (FM) have been used to improve the friction level of the wheel/ rail interface [22,23]. The wheel/rail interfacial friction coefficient is strongly dependent on the rheological properties of third-body layer from different FMs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leaf fall can also cause a lot disturbance to traffic on the network [45]. Research into leaf contamination and low adhesion has been carried out using various methods including actual trains [67], pin-on-disc [58,68], twin-disc [69,70] and ball-on-disc [71] test rigs. A comparison of these tests was discussed in [72], and is shown in Table 4.…”
Section: Wheel-rail Adhesion Under Contaminated Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was pointed out that with increased thickness of the oxide layer on the railhead surface the friction coefficient reduces [72] although no definitive relationship was found between leaf contamination thickness and the friction levels [64]. [68] GallardoHernandez and Lewis [70] Li et al [69] Cann [71] Arias-Cuevas and Li [67] Test apparatus Pin-on-disc …”
Section: Wheel-rail Adhesion Under Contaminated Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%