2003
DOI: 10.1080/03052150310001624403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rolling element bearing design through genetic algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past, many GAs have been prescribed to solve multi-objective optimization problems (Andersson, 2001;Chakraborty et al, 2003;Qiu et al, 2014). Among different multi-objective genetic algorithms (MOGA), the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm (SPEA2) is commonly regarded as one of the best in terms of search performance.…”
Section: Presentation Of the Ispea2 Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, many GAs have been prescribed to solve multi-objective optimization problems (Andersson, 2001;Chakraborty et al, 2003;Qiu et al, 2014). Among different multi-objective genetic algorithms (MOGA), the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm (SPEA2) is commonly regarded as one of the best in terms of search performance.…”
Section: Presentation Of the Ispea2 Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some contribution on the design of rolling bearings was made by earlier work of Chakraborty et al [10] and Rao and Tiwari [11], where GA was used to optimize dynamic capacity for rolling bearings. Results in [10,11] were found to be as much as 1.5 times better than those given in standard bearing catalogue [19]. Primary difference between previous works and that presented in this paper is the inclusion of multiple objectives for the simultaneous optimisation.…”
Section: Application and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work uses both deterministic methods (penalty functions) and stochastic algorithms (simulated annealing and genetic search). The genetic approach was further explored by Chakraborty et al [7] for ball bearings and its merits were compared to conventional techniques. Also based on genetic algorithms, a non-linear optimization procedure was developed by Rao and Tiwari [8] for the design of ball bearings with maximum fatigue life under kinematic constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Papers dealing with the optimization of bearing features have appeared only lately, aimed at maximizing one or several performance properties of ball bearings [5][6][7][8][9][10][11], cylindrical roller bearings [12,13] and tapered roller bearings [14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%