Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) are traditionally divided empirically into two main classes: "radio-loud" and "radio-quiet" sources. These labels, which are more than fifty years old, are obsolete, misleading, and wrong. I argue that AGN should be classified based on a fundamentally physical rather than just an observational difference, namely the presence (or lack) of strong relativistic jets, and that we should use the terms "jetted" and "non-jetted" AGN instead.Everybody knows that AGN are powered by a supermassive black hole (SMBH). And (almost) everybody knows that there are two main classes of AGN: the "radio-loud" (RL) and the "radio-quiet" (RQ) ones. These classifications go all the way back to Sandage (1965), who realised, soon after the discovery of the first quasar, 3C 273, a very strong radio source, that there were many similar sources in the sky, which were however undetected by the radio telescopes of the time. It was later understood that these quasars were only "radio-faint", but the name stuck. Indeed, for the same optical power the radio powers of RQ quasars are a few orders of magnitude smaller than those of their RL counterparts. This is, in fact, how RQ quasars are characterised: relatively low radio-to-optical flux density ratios (R 10) and radio powers (P 1.4GHz 10 24 W Hz −1 locally: e.g., Padovani, 2016).We know now that RQ AGN are the norm, not the exception, as they make up the large majority (> 90%) of the AGN class (e.g., Padovani, 2011). We also know that, despite what the odd labels might suggest, the differences between the two classes are not restricted to the radio band, far from it. And they are not simply taxonomic either, as the two classes represent intrinsically different objects, with most RL AGN emitting a large fraction of their energy non-thermally over the whole electromagnetic spectrum while the multi-wavelength emission of RQ AGN is dominated by thermal emission, directly or indirectly related to the accretion disk, which forms around the SMBH.The most striking difference is in the hard X-ray to γ-ray band: while many (likely all: but see below) RL sources emit all the way up to GeV (2.4 × 10 23 Hz), and sometimes TeV (2.4 × 10 26 Hz), energies, nearby (RQ) bright Seyfert galaxies have a sharp cut-off at energies 1 MeV (e.g., Malizia et al, 2014). This cut-off has to apply to the whole RQ AGN population in order not to violate the X-ray background above this energies (Comastri et al, 2005). Moreover, no RQ AGN has ever been detected in γ-rays (Ackermann et al, 2012a) with the exception of NGC 1068 and NGC 4945, two Seyfert 2 galaxies in which the γ-ray emission is thought to be related to their starburst component (Ackermann et al, 2012b). This means that, while RQ AGN are actually not radio-quiet, they are γ-ray-quiet.What are the differences between the two classes due to? One simple thing: the presence (or absence) of a strong relativistic jet. The relative (and absolute) strength of the 1