2019
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2018.2873141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roll-Off Displacement in Ex Vivo Experiments of RF Ablation With Refrigerated Saline Solution and Refrigerated Deionized Water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3(b), the pulsed RFA protocol results in the formation of alternating temperature spikes that are located between the lower and higher values pertaining to the duration and frequency of the applied pulse train, restricting or delaying the occurrence of charring. As mentioned earlier, the charring is highly undesirable phenomena during the RFA procedure that results in dramatic increase of the impedance and prevents the RF power generator from delivering further energy within the biological tissue [9,[25][26]. Different strategies are developed and adopted in clinical practices to either mitigate or delay the occurrence of charring during the RFA procedure by either modifying the RF delivery protocol or the RF electrode [10].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3(b), the pulsed RFA protocol results in the formation of alternating temperature spikes that are located between the lower and higher values pertaining to the duration and frequency of the applied pulse train, restricting or delaying the occurrence of charring. As mentioned earlier, the charring is highly undesirable phenomena during the RFA procedure that results in dramatic increase of the impedance and prevents the RF power generator from delivering further energy within the biological tissue [9,[25][26]. Different strategies are developed and adopted in clinical practices to either mitigate or delay the occurrence of charring during the RFA procedure by either modifying the RF delivery protocol or the RF electrode [10].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be due to two competing factors: 1) COS DW 100 has a lower dynamic viscosity, which leads to a larger distribution of cationic polymer solution than CMC DW 100 , and 2) CMC DW 100 has a higher electrical conductivity than COS DW 100 in the liver tissues. In addition, it is worth mentioning that, different from the saline solution (0.0007 Pa•s in dynamic viscosity), the higher dynamic viscosity of COS DW 100 (0.01 Pa•s) or CMC DW 100 (0.61 Pa•s) can limit the solution diffusion area, which may help to avoid large and irregular diffusion zones (see Supplementary Video (3)(4)(5)). Therefore, it is reasonable to believe that a regular and predictable ablation zone can be achieved using COS DW 100 or CMC DW 100 compared to the saline solution [41], [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when the tissue is heated above 100°C, it becomes desiccated due to water evaporation and further charred. In fact, the RFA systems currently used in clinical practice are designed such that the delivery of RF power is halted when an abrupt increase in impedance has been detected, a phenomenon known as "roll off" [4], [5]. Roll-off due to increased impedance is one of the main reasons for the incomplete ablation of large tumors treated by RFA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although tissue impedance decreases as heating begins, the dehydration of the target region caused by the vaporization of moisture leads to an increase in impedance [ 19 ]. As a result of tissue carbonization, the expansion of the coagulation volume is limited, which compromises the effectiveness of the RFA procedure and exacerbates the roll-off phenomenon [ 37 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%