Roles of Relationships Between Large Shareholders and Managers in Radical Innovation: A Stewardship Theory Perspective

Abstract

Radical innovation is critical for firms to enhance their competitiveness. Whether they can achieve it, however, depends on organizational factors, including the corporate governance of the firm. In emerging economies in which shareholder protection is weak, large shareholders are widely used as an efficient governance mechanism to reduce agency problems. The literature on agency theory contains conflicting arguments regarding the role of large shareholders in firm innovation performance and has underestimated the role of social relationships between large shareholders and managers in determining the firm's innovation performance. By applying a stewardship theory perspective, this article argues that the characteristics of the relationship between large shareholders (owners) and managers, manifested as trust and shared goals, may explain variations in a firm's radical innovation. Drawing on data from 174 Chinese firms with large shareholders, our results show that trust has an inverted U-shaped relationship with firm radical innovation, whereas shared goals exhibit a positive linear relationship with radical innovation. Shared goals further moderate the nonlinear effect of trust on radical innovation. Trust is almost negatively related to firm radical innovation when there is a low level of shared goals. However, when there is a high level of shared goals, the relationship between trust and firm radical innovation is first positive, then plateaus, and finally becomes negative. These findings advance our understanding of the role of the relationship between large shareholders and managers as a driver of radical innovation and contribute to the innovation literature by providing a nuanced understanding of the key factors that influence the effects of the social aspects of governance on firm radical innovation. Practitioner PointsManagers are suggested to build a moderate level of trust with large shareholder in order to obtain a good performance of radical innovation.Managers need to share common goals with large shareholders during radical innovation.Managers also need to know the important combined effects of their trust and shared goals with large shareholders on radical innovation.

Board Governance, Sustainable Innovation Capability and Corporate Expansion: Empirical Data from Private Listed Companies in China

“…As a result, managers, motivated by their sense of achievement and mission, will take the initiative to complete challenging work and assume responsibility in order to obtain internal satisfaction, such as maintaining a high level of innovation motivation and enthusiasm. Then they incline to implementing more active innovation decisions, and improving the sustainable innovation capability of Chinese private listed companies [29,30]. In addition, CEO duality has formed a relatively centralized leadership structure, which not only has a positive impact on reducing the communication time of internal decision-making and reducing the differences between the board of directors and the managers, but also helps managers to integrate the strategic decision-making capital of executive directors and non-executive directors which makes the knowledge and experience of the board of directors and managers easier to transfer and transform within the company [31].…”

Who is going to save the Brazilian Amazon forest? Reflections on deforestation, wildlife eviction, and stewardship behavior

“…The Government is the institution with the right power to create and apply control mechanisms that contribute to good governance (Bennett et al, 2018). In a complementary way, the Government's need to adopt stewardship behavior towards society is reinforced, attending to collective interests, with honor and ethics in its decisions, valuing the common good, through intrinsic motivations linked to the performance of a dignified work (Hernandez, 2012; Welchman, 1999; Zhang et al, 2017).…”

“…This means that managers will seek to act generally with altruism for the benefit of the organization and its stakeholders, for the benefit of the collective good (Miller & Le Breton‐Miller, 2006). Precisely because of its roots in sociology and psychology, Stewardship Theory describes a more humanistic model of man, based on the socialized (noneconomic) assumption of human nature (Madison et al, 2015; Zhang et al, 2017).…”

“…Forest fire, animal poaching, and illegal timber trade are some of the common crimes against it. This article discusses the Brazilian Amazon deforestation and its impact on animal life, unraveling the causes and proposing guidelines for solutions through Stewardship Theory, involving relationships among organizations, employees, and society based on collaboration, cooperation, ethics, and honor (Hernandez, 2012; Zhang et al, 2017).…”

Letter to editor: brain awareness week, CoVID-19 infection and neurological sciences

“…Selfsacrificing or altruistic behavior has been introduced as part of the "stewardship theory." To date, most studies in this area have focused on the stewardship behavior of managers [13]. Opposite of this view has been seen in a recent article and also in news during COVID-19 [14,15].…”