2016
DOI: 10.1519/ssc.0000000000000193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roles of Maximal Strength and Rate of Force Development in Maximizing Muscular Power

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study using linear-position technology to quantify effects of partial sleep deprivation on submaximal weight lifting efforts (Bench and inclined Leg Press). Force-velocity linear encoders such as the one we used in this study allow measurement of power output, arguably the primary determinant of sport success; as well as rate of force development, also an important and an underpinning mechanism of power output to be measured (Bevan et al 2010;Hawley et al 1992;Stone et al 2002;Taber et al 2016).We have found similar muscle force and power findings in our control condition to those previously reported at 17:00 h in bench press using a different cohort (Robertson et al 2018). We have used complex exercises that replicate the movements associated with athletic performance (Chapman et al 1998;LeSuer et al 1997).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study using linear-position technology to quantify effects of partial sleep deprivation on submaximal weight lifting efforts (Bench and inclined Leg Press). Force-velocity linear encoders such as the one we used in this study allow measurement of power output, arguably the primary determinant of sport success; as well as rate of force development, also an important and an underpinning mechanism of power output to be measured (Bevan et al 2010;Hawley et al 1992;Stone et al 2002;Taber et al 2016).We have found similar muscle force and power findings in our control condition to those previously reported at 17:00 h in bench press using a different cohort (Robertson et al 2018). We have used complex exercises that replicate the movements associated with athletic performance (Chapman et al 1998;LeSuer et al 1997).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…39 Besides, the EG increased body mass by 2 kg and thus could lead to strength increase. 40 , 41 However, a small improvement in BP was also noted in the CG. These results could be because swimming training also contributes to improving strength performance, whereas ST combined with swimming training could lead to greater improvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The plasticity of RFD in addition to its greater relevance to most athletic tasks [15,16] make it a superior monitoring variable than PF. In well-trained strength athletes, PF may be more effectively used for monitoring long term changes in maximal force producing abilities while RFD provides a more comprehensive indication of the current performance potential of the athlete.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strong correlations (r ≥ 0.70) have been observed between these variables and weightlifting performance [12,13,14]. However, research suggests that RFD is more closely related to most athletic tasks [15,16] and is more sensitive to fatigue [12,17]. Haff et al [18] reported that calculating RFD using specific time bands results in higher reliability than quantifying peak RFD values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%