2005
DOI: 10.1037/1093-4510.8.1.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roles of Instruments in Psychological Research.

Abstract: What roles have instruments played in psychology and related disciplines? How have instruments affected the dynamics of psychological research, with what possibilities and limits? What is the psychological instrument? This article provides a conceptual foundation for specific case studies concerning such questions. The discussion begins by challenging widely accepted assumptions about the subject and analyzing the general relations between scientific experimentation and the uses of instruments in psychology. B… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But the epistemic work of the tool is done by the ways in which the questions are asked, not by the physical medium in which they are presented. In this respect I am in full agreement with Sturm and Ash (2005), who write that "there is no good reason to define the concept of instrument or of psychological instruments in such a way that only physical devices, let alone technologically advanced ones, are included" (Sturm and Ash 2005, 15). But even if this is true, it does not follow that concepts can be instances of such non-physical and non-mechanical tools.…”
Section: Why Tools Do Not Have To Be Physicalsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…But the epistemic work of the tool is done by the ways in which the questions are asked, not by the physical medium in which they are presented. In this respect I am in full agreement with Sturm and Ash (2005), who write that "there is no good reason to define the concept of instrument or of psychological instruments in such a way that only physical devices, let alone technologically advanced ones, are included" (Sturm and Ash 2005, 15). But even if this is true, it does not follow that concepts can be instances of such non-physical and non-mechanical tools.…”
Section: Why Tools Do Not Have To Be Physicalsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In line with Sturm and Ash (2005) and Cleary (1977), students expressed an appreciation for understanding the roots of psychology, particularly as that history relates to future directions in the discipline. Also, consistent with the AAAS (1993) and NRC (1996) students valued learning about the instruments to generate research ideas and better understand behavior and relevant literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…A substantial body of internationally gathered evidence supports the proposition that the meditative state can be understood naturalistically as a neurobiological condition that imparts a host of 4 DAVID T. SCHMIT JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF THE BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES DOI: 10.1002/jhbs 7. For examinations of the role these kinds of instruments have played in the history of psychology, see Rosler (2005), Sokal, Davis, and Merzbach (1976), and Sturm and Ash (2005). physical and psychological benefits to practitioners. Most remarkable is the speed at which a practice enshrined by thousands of years of monastic practice has been stripped of its religious piety and spiritual meanings.…”
Section: Meditation Research and Practice In The Westmentioning
confidence: 99%