2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2006.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roles of DRB1∗1501 and DRB1∗1502 in the pathogenesis of aplastic anemia

Abstract: Category Clinical investigations Word countsTotal text word count: 3412 words Abstract word count: 240 words 2 ABSTRACTObjective. Although a number of reports have documented a significantly increased incidence of HLA-DR15 in aplastic anemia (AA), the exact role of HLA-DR15 in the immune mechanisms of AA remains unclear. We herein clarify the difference between DRB1*1501 and DRB1*1502, the 2 DRB1 alleles which determine the presentation of HLA-DR15, in the pathophysiology of AA. Materials and Methods.We invest… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
59
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
6
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18 A relatively good response to immunosuppressive therapy for patients with MDS and aplastic anemia was also predicted by expression of HLA-DR15 in studies of both North American and Japanese patients. 24,25 These observations support the hypothesis that aplastic anemia and a subgroup of low-risk MDS are immune-mediated diseases, and that the immune pathophysiological process provides the selection pressure that favors the outgrowth of PIGA mutant, GPI-AP-deficient stem cells.…”
Section: Subclinical Pnhsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…18 A relatively good response to immunosuppressive therapy for patients with MDS and aplastic anemia was also predicted by expression of HLA-DR15 in studies of both North American and Japanese patients. 24,25 These observations support the hypothesis that aplastic anemia and a subgroup of low-risk MDS are immune-mediated diseases, and that the immune pathophysiological process provides the selection pressure that favors the outgrowth of PIGA mutant, GPI-AP-deficient stem cells.…”
Section: Subclinical Pnhsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…It is generally considered that DR2 and its subgroups are associated with the effectiveness of pure CsA treatment or enhanced IST, but irrelevant for simple ATG or antilymphocyte globulin (ALG) treatment. Among Japanese AA patients, the reactivity of pure CsA treatment or enhanced IST in DR2 + or DRB1*15:01 + patients was significantly higher than that in DR2 -or DRB1*15:01 -patients (22,(24)(25)(26). However, no difference in the reactivity of pure ATG treatment was observed between these kinds of patients (20).…”
Section: Ist-effective Group (N=49) Healthy Control Group (N=222) ---mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…However, we previously examined various factors, including GPI-AP -cells and DRB1*1501, for their association with good response to IST in 140 patients with AA using multivariate analysis and found that only the presence of increased GPI-AP -cells significantly predicts favorable response to IST. 30,31 Thus, it is unlikely that DRB1*1501 affects PFS of patients with MDS more strongly than increased GPI-AP -cells or high TPO levels. Cytogenetic abnormality was not identified as a poor risk factor by the multivariate analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%