2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2020.188409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roles of CA19-9 in pancreatic cancer: Biomarker, predictor and promoter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
114
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
5
114
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with normal tissues, DCBLD2 expression increased in PDAC tissues, which revealed an oncogenic role of DCBLD2. The diagnostic ability of DCBLD2 in tissues was satisfactory, as the AUC value was close to or no less than CA19-9, an established diagnostic biomarker for PDAC (Luo et al, 2020). Extracellular vesicles contain proteins, lipids and RNA from donor cells and can be an attractive source of diagnostic biomarkers for human cancers (Yu et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Compared with normal tissues, DCBLD2 expression increased in PDAC tissues, which revealed an oncogenic role of DCBLD2. The diagnostic ability of DCBLD2 in tissues was satisfactory, as the AUC value was close to or no less than CA19-9, an established diagnostic biomarker for PDAC (Luo et al, 2020). Extracellular vesicles contain proteins, lipids and RNA from donor cells and can be an attractive source of diagnostic biomarkers for human cancers (Yu et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, its sensitivity is approximately 80%, 2 with the result that some pancreatic cancer patients are false-negative for CA19-9, and the major challenges include false-negatives for Lewisnegative individuals. 3 The current analysis demonstrated the prognostic significance of the ALBI grade even in the CA19-9-negative group.…”
Section: Presentmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…All the above-described miRNAs outperformed with respect to the established PDAC biomarker CA 19-9, which levels did not significantly differ between controls and patients. This finding is not surprising, considering its low sensitivity for early tumor diagnosis [50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%