“…community could experiment, discuss, document and record between workshops, with • the discussion and of culturally appropriate research ethics protocols, leading to the synthesis of tools, methods and ethics specific to their community, culture and concerns, and then • the exploration and documentation of the information needs and habits, the livelihoods, markets and occupations, the educational experiences and expectations; the infrastructure, access and environment; and of individuals and groups within the community [53], leading to • the selection, introduction, adaptation, evaluation and eventual integration of progressive digital learning tools and techniques, alongside training and supporting community members to populate, manage, curate, moderate and direct their own platform and space • feeding the evidence, analysis and synthesis through to the policy and funding communities in ways that challenge the current filters, skews and biases currently constraining their opinions and values. This differs from many earlier documented participative processes [54] in aiming to engage and empower communities, rather than deliver an artefact.…”