1998
DOI: 10.13031/2013.17268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role Ofwater Table Management in Reducing Metribuzin Pollution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Residues were found to 20 cm soil depth with a slight increase at 110 DAA after an accumulated rainfall of 144 mm. Jebellie and Prasher (1998) recovered more metribuzin from soil maintained under free drainage than from treatments where water table was controlled at 0.4 or 0.8 m from the soil surface. In another study, metribuzin concentrations were significantly higher ( p < 0.009) in soil incubated at 20% than 50% water content (Jebellie et al, 1996).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Residues were found to 20 cm soil depth with a slight increase at 110 DAA after an accumulated rainfall of 144 mm. Jebellie and Prasher (1998) recovered more metribuzin from soil maintained under free drainage than from treatments where water table was controlled at 0.4 or 0.8 m from the soil surface. In another study, metribuzin concentrations were significantly higher ( p < 0.009) in soil incubated at 20% than 50% water content (Jebellie et al, 1996).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Likewise, Fan (2010) [52] conducted a lysimeter study and observed that a considerable amount of surface-applied metribuzin had migrated through a sandy soil to a depth greater than 0.1 m within the first 7 days, and then decreased gradually afterwards. Similarly, results from a study investigating the mobility of metribuzin under free drainage conditions, revealed that a significant portion of surface-applied metribuzin was detected below a 0.1 m soil depth, six days after application [71]. At the 0.3 m depth, the effect of surfactant treatments contrasted with the 0.1 m depth, since metribuzin concentrations were higher in the presence of surfactant compared to the tap water ( Figure 6).…”
Section: Effect Of Nonionic Surfactant Brij35 On Metribuzin Residues mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…To extract alachlor from the soil, 30 mL of 99.8% methanol was added to the soil and shake for one hour. The mixtures were filtered and then collected organic phase volume was reduced in a rotary evaporator for about 15 min [29]. Then rinsed with 10 mL of 99.8% n-hexane and stored in a refrigerator prior to GC analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%