1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf00028929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of weeds in the management of nitrogen in a young Pinus radiata plantation

Abstract: Application. Weeds in young Pinus radiata plantations can greatly retard tree growth by competing for mineral N . Although tree growth will be improved by maintaining a plantation weed-free or by adding N fertilizer, high N supply can induce stem deformation . Partial weed control may benefit productivity in the long-term because weeds reduce leaching of N .Abstract. Pinus radiata trees were grown on a podzolized sandy soil at a second rotation site under the following treatments: total weed control, total wee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that total and labile N parameters varied as a result of weed biomass. Smethurst and Nambiar (1989) and Woods et al (1992) recognized the pros and cons of N immobilization by weeds in plantations. Principle components analysis at both sampling positions in the 0-5-cm soil depth also indicated a significant contribution of labile N (NO 3 --N and NH 4 + -N), δ 15 N, and HWETN to the variation in soil nutrient patterns.…”
Section: Treatment and Sampling Effects On Soil N Pools δ 15 N And mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests that total and labile N parameters varied as a result of weed biomass. Smethurst and Nambiar (1989) and Woods et al (1992) recognized the pros and cons of N immobilization by weeds in plantations. Principle components analysis at both sampling positions in the 0-5-cm soil depth also indicated a significant contribution of labile N (NO 3 --N and NH 4 + -N), δ 15 N, and HWETN to the variation in soil nutrient patterns.…”
Section: Treatment and Sampling Effects On Soil N Pools δ 15 N And mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Despite the reasons for the plantation management decisions, sustaining and investigating the soils productive capacity has become a priority which is now formally endorsed around the world by the plantation certification, forestry standards, and global climate change research (Weil and Magdoff 2004;Xu and Chen 2006). The effects of weed control and fertilization to maximize growth and encourage the efficient use of nutrients could therefore be summarized not only by their contribution to the plantation productivity but also by how they affect soil processes during the earlyage, establishment phase (Smethurst and Nambiar 1989;Woods et al 1992), as has been done in the past with other forest management practices (Vitousek and Matson 1984;Xu et al 2008Xu et al , 2009. Contemporary research on this subject shows a complexity of results due to the nature of soils (Jobbagy and Jackson 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over time fertilization may cause a change in species composition (Chapin et al, 1986) that will promote a more productive understory resulting in a greater amount of litter added to a site for decomposition. This will result in conservation of nutrients and a slow release ''fertilization'' over a long period of time after fertilization due to decomposition and a continual cycle of uptake and decomposition (Haines and Haines, 1979;Flanagan and Van Cleve, 1983;Miller et al, 1989;Smethurst and Nambiar, 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Many studies have addressed questions related to N availability in Australian forest soils (Smethurst and Nambiar 1989, 1990, 1995Carlyle 1995;Bubb et al 1998;Wang et al 1998;Blumfield and Xu 2003;Blumfield et al 2005Blumfield et al , 2006Xu et al 2008a, b), including N mineralization, nitrification, and leaching. These studies of N fluxes prompted the more effective use of N fertilizer in the region (Wang et al 1998;Xu 2006, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%