2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4935932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of van der Waals corrections in first principles simulations of alkali metal ions in aqueous solutions

Abstract: By resorting to a novel implementation of the first-principles-based van der Waals correction (vdWC) based on maximally localized Wannier functions (MLWFs), we inspect its performance and assess its reliability for aqueous solutions of alkali metal ions. In our implementation of vdWCs, an efficient extrapolation scheme is introduced to allow for affordable first principles molecular dynamics avoiding the explicit recalculation of MLWFs at each step. We find that vdWCs, when added to the widely used revPBE grad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
(107 reference statements)
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Keeping in mind that the DFT-D2 formula proposed by Grimme (2006) was employed in a recent investigation (Bouzid et al, 2015b), we turn to an alternative recipe (vdW W ) for comparative purposes. It is appropriate in this context to recall the main foundations of this scheme, by referring the reader for details to the original papers thoroughly illustrating this formalism and the connections with the concept of maximally localized Wannier functions (MLWFs) (Wannier, 1937;Silvestrelli et al, 1998;Ikeda and Boero, 2015). Accordingly, one writes the vdW interaction in the standard way (Andersson et al, 1996), namely:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Keeping in mind that the DFT-D2 formula proposed by Grimme (2006) was employed in a recent investigation (Bouzid et al, 2015b), we turn to an alternative recipe (vdW W ) for comparative purposes. It is appropriate in this context to recall the main foundations of this scheme, by referring the reader for details to the original papers thoroughly illustrating this formalism and the connections with the concept of maximally localized Wannier functions (MLWFs) (Wannier, 1937;Silvestrelli et al, 1998;Ikeda and Boero, 2015). Accordingly, one writes the vdW interaction in the standard way (Andersson et al, 1996), namely:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the cluster-continuum calculations, error sources include the selection of the clusters (sampling), their small sizes (smooth trends and fast convergence being required for a meaningful extrapolation 117 ), the estimation of the cluster entropy, 118-120 the choice of a cluster permittivity in the CE calculation, and the problems associated with a QM-CE boundary (surface definition, atomic radii). For the CPMD/BOMD calculations, error sources include the shortcomings of DFT methods in terms of electron correlation (including dispersion), affecting both bulk water properties [121][122][123][124][125][126][127][128][129][130] and ion-water interactions, 66,67,105,131 the small system sizes considered (resulting in a high weight for the approximate finite-size correction term), the very limited sampling times, the ambiguity in defining the appropriate reference potential within DFT water, 21,112,[132][133][134][135][136] and the numerical problems (see, e.g., footnotes 42 and 45 in Ref. 111) associated with creating a species or injecting electrons when applying computational alchemy in a QM framework [137][138][139][140][141][142][143] (see, however, Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, in Ref. 10, we focused on the comparison between distinct sets of BLYP data, namely the two already available (not including dispersion forces, named NovdW and adopting the D2-Grimme scheme, named vdW G ) and a third one, making use of the maximally localized Wannier functions (MLWF) framework (vdW W hereafter), known for exploiting the evolution of the electronic structure when updating the dispersion coefficients [12][13][14][15] . Taken altogether, the results obtained did not provide unambiguous indications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%