2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.09.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of tumour-free margin distance for loco-regional control in vulvar cancer—a subset analysis of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie CaRE-1 multicenter study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
44
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
44
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Vulvar recurrence rates were 12.6% in patients with a margin <8 mm and 10.2% in patients with a margin ≥8 mm. Consequently the need for a minimal margin of 8 mm could not be confirmed in the AGO CaRE-1 cohort 23. The question of adjuvant radiotherapy in the case of close margins has also not been answered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Vulvar recurrence rates were 12.6% in patients with a margin <8 mm and 10.2% in patients with a margin ≥8 mm. Consequently the need for a minimal margin of 8 mm could not be confirmed in the AGO CaRE-1 cohort 23. The question of adjuvant radiotherapy in the case of close margins has also not been answered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Of these patients, 43%–72% will develop a second local recurrence and subsequently 57% will have a third or even more local recurrences 16. Recent German AGO CaRE-1 study data showed a lower local disease recurrence rate in node-negative VSCC of 11.8% (n=34) after median 18.3 months 23. In literature there are only six studies that investigated local recurrence rates for patients with and without vulvar LS and these studies found conflicting results 24–28.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent, multicenter retrospective study, AGO-CaRE-1, observed no statistically significant impact of the clear pathological margin distance on local recurrence. 9 The safe surgical margin seems to still be on debate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis of 10 studies showed that a tumor-free margin of < 8 mm is associated with a higher risk of local recurrence, compared with a tumor-free margin of ≥ 8 mm [12]. A subgroup analysis of 289 solely surgically treated node-negative patients with complete tumor resection enrolled in the German AGO-CaRE-1 retrospective study found that vulvar recurrence rates were 10.2% for patients with a margin of ≥ 8 mm and 12.6% for those with a closer margin; the margin distance had no significant impact on local recurrence in multivariate analysis, neither when analyzed as a continuous variable nor categorically based on the 8-mm cut-off [13]. As far as node resection is concerned, Micheletti et al [14] suggested a technique of complete deep femoral lymphadenectomy with preservation of the fascia lata and cribriform fascia, thus decreasing the intraoperative risks and reducing dead spaces with the tendency to retain secretions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%