2014
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/561/1/012017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Trapped Electrons on Global Gyrokinetic Linear Stability of Collisionless Microtearing Modes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The growth rates of the KBM modes increase with β; these growth rates peak at long wavelength, k y ρ s ∼ 0.15 but the growth rate in the long wavelength limit is not much lower than the peak growth rate, as in the density-gradient driven case. For all but the lowest β case, the vector potential of the modes in the electron diamagnetic direction exhibit even parity (consistent with tearing modes [52][53][54]) and are therefore microtearing modes [52,[55][56][57][58]. A comparison for A ∥ in the ballooning space is shown in figure 6 for β = 8.1% and for k y ρ s = 0.414 and k y ρ s = 0.77 which exhibit real frequency respectively in the ion and electron direction.…”
Section: Linear Simulations Two-species Casesmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The growth rates of the KBM modes increase with β; these growth rates peak at long wavelength, k y ρ s ∼ 0.15 but the growth rate in the long wavelength limit is not much lower than the peak growth rate, as in the density-gradient driven case. For all but the lowest β case, the vector potential of the modes in the electron diamagnetic direction exhibit even parity (consistent with tearing modes [52][53][54]) and are therefore microtearing modes [52,[55][56][57][58]. A comparison for A ∥ in the ballooning space is shown in figure 6 for β = 8.1% and for k y ρ s = 0.414 and k y ρ s = 0.77 which exhibit real frequency respectively in the ion and electron direction.…”
Section: Linear Simulations Two-species Casesmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The gradient in the plasma profile can drive several temperature and density gradient instabilities, such as ITG [6,[27][28][29][30], trapped electron mode (TEM) [31,32], universal drift modes [33,34] etc which are electrostatic in nature. Similar profile gradients may also produce electromagnetic instabilities such as kinetic ballooning mode (KBM) [35][36][37][38][39][40] and micro tearing mode [41][42][43][44][45] if the plasma β is high [46,47]. In the present study, the core plasma beta β = 2µ 0 n 0e T 0e /B 2 0 , where T 0e , n 0e and B 0 are the on-axis electron temperature, density and the magnetic field strength with the values of n 0e = 2.3 × 10 19 m −3 , T 0e = 250 eV and B 0 = 1.0 T is approximately 0.1%.…”
Section: Linear Gyrokinetic Simulations With Orb5 and Glogystomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In gyrokinetic simulations, MT were found unstable in the conventional tokamaks JET 7,8,11 , ASDEX Upgrade 32,33 , and DIII-D [34][35][36][37] , in spherical tokamaks [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] , and in the reversed-field pinch 49,50 . Recently, different techniques have been developed to track magnetic fluctuations in JET 7 or the dynamical frequency evolution of MT in DIII-D 36 , in order to validate nonlinear simulations against tokamak pedestal data and leading to a quantitative description of the experimentally observed magnetic fluctuations, highlighting the need to determine the role played by this micro-instability in transport and confinement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%