Role of thoracoscopic pleural lavage and brush in undiagnosed exudative pleural effusion

Abstract

Background: The accurate diagnosis of pleural effusion remains a challenging problem even after thoracentesis and closed pleural biopsy. Medical thoracoscopy has been established to have a greater diagnostic yield in the diagnosis of exudative pleural effusion. Forceps biopsy, pleural brush and lavage could be used through medical thoracoscopy to obtain pleural specimens.Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of thoracoscopic pleural lavage and brush in undiagnosed exudative pleural effusion.Patients and methods: This prospective study was carried out on 25 patients having undiagnosed exudative pleural effusion. All patients submitted to medical thoracoscopy, where forceps biopsy, pleural brush and pleural lavage specimens were taken for all patients and sent for histopathological and cytological examination.Results: Combined thoracoscopic pleural specimens were diagnostic in 24 patients (96%), and all of them were malignant. Forceps biopsy was positive in 23 patients (92%), while pleural brush and pleural lavage were positive in 18 patients (72%) and 15 patients (60%) respectively. Pleural brush was the only diagnostic modality in one patient. Minimal complications were recorded.Conclusion: Combined thoracoscopic pleural specimens (forceps biopsy, brush and lavage) increase the diagnostic yield of medical thoracoscopy for patients with undiagnosed exudative pleural effusion than separate them. Thoracoscopic pleural brushing is a safe diagnostic technique as it can brush certain dangerous areas of the pleura. Pleural lavage is more diagnostic than the initial thoracentesis.