2009
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0908946107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of the translocation partner in protection against AID-dependent chromosomal translocations

Abstract: Chromosome translocations between Ig (Ig) and non-Ig genes are frequently associated with B-cell lymphomas in humans and mice. The best characterized of these is c-myc/IgH translocation, which is associated with Burkitt's lymphoma. These translocations are caused by activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), which produces double-strand DNA breaks in both genes. c-myc/IgH translocations are rare events, in part because ATM, p53, and p19 actively suppress them. To further define the mechanism of protection ag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
2
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, C-NHEJ has been shown to join DSBs on the same chromosome preferentially and thereby to suppress translocations (39). Moreover, the DSB response involving factors such as ATM, 53BP1, and H2AX has been shown to be required for normal joining of DSBs via NHEJ (25,36,40). In this regard, the DSB response also has been suggested as promoting long-range joining of intrachromosomal DSBs (41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, C-NHEJ has been shown to join DSBs on the same chromosome preferentially and thereby to suppress translocations (39). Moreover, the DSB response involving factors such as ATM, 53BP1, and H2AX has been shown to be required for normal joining of DSBs via NHEJ (25,36,40). In this regard, the DSB response also has been suggested as promoting long-range joining of intrachromosomal DSBs (41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These translocations are normally prevented by the tumour suppressor genes ATM, CDKN2A (p19, ARF) and TP53, consistent with the ability of these genes to inhibit progression through the cell cycle and to initiate DNA repair or apoptosis in the presence of DNA damage (although it appears that different molecules may protect against different translocations, (Jankovic et al, 2010), such that these same tumour suppressor genes would not necessarily prevent a translocation involving a different partner with IGH (Ramiro et al, 2007). The persistence of translocations is, conversely, inhibited by the pro-apoptotic genes BBC3 (PUMA), BCL2L11 (BIM) and RIPK4 (PKCdelta) and enhanced by the anti-apoptotic BCL2L1 (BCL-XL) and TNFSF13B (BAFF), while FAS-induced apoptosis is involved in the elimination of cells in which a functional class switch is not created.…”
Section: Malaria and Blmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition, expression of AID was shown to lead to the generation of point mutations for SHM and CSR, resulting in DNA damage and apoptosis, (37) probably in the deregulated expression of anti-apoptotic factors such as bcl-2 and bcl-XL. (38) These findings suggest that cell-cycle arrest or apoptosis can be ultimately induced when sufficient AID is subsequently expressed in B lymphocytes after CSR. Interestingly, among our sources of lymphoma samples, two BLs and one de novo Burkitt-like DLBCL (BCLU1) did express c-myc and AID, but not bcl-2, and they did not undergo G 0 ⁄ G 1 arrest (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%