2007
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00258.2007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of the Primate Superior Colliculus in the Control of Head Movements

Abstract: One important behavioral role for head movements is to assist in the redirection of gaze. However, primates also frequently make head movements that do not involve changes in the line of sight. Virtually nothing is known about the neural basis of these head-only movements. In the present study, single-unit extracellular activity was recorded from the superior colliculus while monkeys performed behavioral tasks that permit the temporal dissociation of gaze shifts and head movements. We sought to determine wheth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
71
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
71
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, since some of our neurons preferred G over T, our data do not exclude the possibility that the SC is partially involved in the early computations for gaze kinematics (and see the next section on Gain modulation). Moreover, this study only examined gaze and did not address the question of whether some neurons have a preference for eye or head movement (Guitton, 1992;Freedman et al, 1996) (but see Walton et al, 2007Walton et al, , 2008. Finally, we could not distinguish the "visual burst" from the "motor burst" (Munoz and Wurtz, 1995;Walker et al, 1995), so it is possible that these two responses might show different results.…”
Section: Target Versus Gaze Movement Codingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, since some of our neurons preferred G over T, our data do not exclude the possibility that the SC is partially involved in the early computations for gaze kinematics (and see the next section on Gain modulation). Moreover, this study only examined gaze and did not address the question of whether some neurons have a preference for eye or head movement (Guitton, 1992;Freedman et al, 1996) (but see Walton et al, 2007Walton et al, , 2008. Finally, we could not distinguish the "visual burst" from the "motor burst" (Munoz and Wurtz, 1995;Walker et al, 1995), so it is possible that these two responses might show different results.…”
Section: Target Versus Gaze Movement Codingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Collicular head-movement related neurons (Walton et al, 2007) were unlikely involved because they are not the "gaze-related" cells studied here. The brake's click sound might have triggered a transient collicular response, but the ϳ10 ms response latency was much shorter than that previously described for SC responses to auditory stimuli (mean, 44.8 ms) (Jay and Sparks, 1987).…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Hundreds of studies comprising numerous areas of the brain, e.g., the paramedian pontine reticular formation (Gandhi and Sparks 2007;Sparks et al 2002), the central mesencephalic reticular formation (Pathmanathan et al 2006a(Pathmanathan et al , 2006b, the pontomedullary region (Cowie and Robinson 1994;Cowie et al 1994), the inhibitory burst neuron area (Cullen and Guitton 1997), the nucleus raphe interpositus (Bergeron and Guitton 2002;Paré and Guitton 1990;Phillips et al 1999), the nucleus reticularis gigantocellularis (Freedman and Quessy 2004;Quessy and Freedman 2004), the caudal fastigial nucleus (Fuchs et al 2010;Quinet and Goffart 2005), the frontal eye fields (Bizzi and Schiller 1970;Chen 2006;Guitton andMandl 1978a, 1978b;Knight and Fuchs 2007;Tu and Keating 2000), the supplementary eye fields (Martinez-Trujillo et al 2003), and the SC (e.g., Corneil et al 2002aCorneil et al , 2002bFreedman and Sparks 1997a;Klier et al 2001;Munoz et al 1991;Rezvani and Corneil 2008;Walton et al 2007Walton et al , 2008, have been published on the subject. Although there is ample evidence that the eyes and head are moved by separate neural commands (Bizzi et al 1971;Corneil et al 2002b;Freedman and Sparks 2000), a persistent and most controversial question concerns the origin of those signals: Are they generated separately or are they decomposed from a gaze signal, and if so where?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%