Abstract:It has long been appreciated that hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a complex disease. HCC is typically preceded by liver cirrhosis, which is itself caused by various types of hepatitis of both viral and nonviral etiologies. Thus, the treatment of patients with HCC requires multiple healthcare professionals, including hepatologists, medical oncologists, surgical oncologists, transplantation surgeons, diagnostic radiologists, pathologists, nurses, nurse practitioners and interventional radiologists. These speci… Show more
“…The increased proportion of patients completing guidelinedriven MDE observed among those evaluated through the VTB program and the overall high rate of patients completing this standard (100%) are noteworthy-higher than those reported by other studies 12,22 -and reflect the magnitude of the impact on cancer care derived from an organized VTB regional program. A retrospective cohort study using the VA Hepatitis C Clinical Case Registry in 2013 reported that only 31% of patients with HCC were evaluated by a surgeon or oncologist 7 ; another analysis using the SEER-Medicare database over a similar time period revealed that only 39% of patients with HCC were evaluated by Ն three HCC cancer care specialists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Tumor boards (TBs) have emerged as a multidisciplinary forum targeted at providing this standard 4,8 and have been shown to be associated with improved satisfaction, outcome, and survival of patients with HCC. [9][10][11][12][13] Effective multidisciplinary evaluation (MDE) through a TB is dependent on local infrastructure and oncology workforce, which are not available at every institution.…”
Purpose: Multidisciplinary evaluation (MDE) of hepatocellular cancer (HCC) is the current standard, often provided through a tumor board (TB) forum; this standard is limited by oncology workforce shortages and lack of a TB at every institution. Virtual TBs (VTBs) may help overcome these limitations. Our study aim was to assess the impact of a regional VTB on the MDE process for patients with HCC.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including patients with HCC referred to a tertiary cancer center from regional facilities (2009 to 2013). Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared based on the referral mechanism: VTB versus subspecialty consultation (non-VTB). The primary outcome was comprehensive MDE (all required specialists present and key topics discussed). Secondary outcomes included timeliness of MDE and travel burden to complete MDE. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were performed to examine the association of a VTB with comprehensive MDE.Results: A total of 116 patients were included in the study; 48 (41.4%) were evaluated through the VTB. A higher proportion of VTB patients received comprehensive MDE (91.7% v 64.7%; P ϭ .001); the VTB was independently associated with higher odds of accomplishing comprehensive MDE (odds ratio, 6.0; 95% CI, 1.2 to 29.9; P ϭ .02). VTB patients completed MDE significantly faster (median, 23 v 39 days; P Ͻ .001), with lower travel burden (median, 0 v 683 miles traveled; P Ͻ .001).
Conclusion:This VTB program positively affected the process of care for patients with HCC by improving the quality and timeliness of the MDE process, while avoiding the burden arising from travel needs. Future studies should focus on implementation of VTB programs on a wider scale.
“…The increased proportion of patients completing guidelinedriven MDE observed among those evaluated through the VTB program and the overall high rate of patients completing this standard (100%) are noteworthy-higher than those reported by other studies 12,22 -and reflect the magnitude of the impact on cancer care derived from an organized VTB regional program. A retrospective cohort study using the VA Hepatitis C Clinical Case Registry in 2013 reported that only 31% of patients with HCC were evaluated by a surgeon or oncologist 7 ; another analysis using the SEER-Medicare database over a similar time period revealed that only 39% of patients with HCC were evaluated by Ն three HCC cancer care specialists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Tumor boards (TBs) have emerged as a multidisciplinary forum targeted at providing this standard 4,8 and have been shown to be associated with improved satisfaction, outcome, and survival of patients with HCC. [9][10][11][12][13] Effective multidisciplinary evaluation (MDE) through a TB is dependent on local infrastructure and oncology workforce, which are not available at every institution.…”
Purpose: Multidisciplinary evaluation (MDE) of hepatocellular cancer (HCC) is the current standard, often provided through a tumor board (TB) forum; this standard is limited by oncology workforce shortages and lack of a TB at every institution. Virtual TBs (VTBs) may help overcome these limitations. Our study aim was to assess the impact of a regional VTB on the MDE process for patients with HCC.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including patients with HCC referred to a tertiary cancer center from regional facilities (2009 to 2013). Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared based on the referral mechanism: VTB versus subspecialty consultation (non-VTB). The primary outcome was comprehensive MDE (all required specialists present and key topics discussed). Secondary outcomes included timeliness of MDE and travel burden to complete MDE. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were performed to examine the association of a VTB with comprehensive MDE.Results: A total of 116 patients were included in the study; 48 (41.4%) were evaluated through the VTB. A higher proportion of VTB patients received comprehensive MDE (91.7% v 64.7%; P ϭ .001); the VTB was independently associated with higher odds of accomplishing comprehensive MDE (odds ratio, 6.0; 95% CI, 1.2 to 29.9; P ϭ .02). VTB patients completed MDE significantly faster (median, 23 v 39 days; P Ͻ .001), with lower travel burden (median, 0 v 683 miles traveled; P Ͻ .001).
Conclusion:This VTB program positively affected the process of care for patients with HCC by improving the quality and timeliness of the MDE process, while avoiding the burden arising from travel needs. Future studies should focus on implementation of VTB programs on a wider scale.
“…An understanding of exactly which features of HCC and patient health may predict the clinical outcome of combination regimens is essential for prescribing individualized evidence-based therapeutic strategies. 40 …”
Section: Synergies and Combination Strategiesmentioning
“…That is why it is considered that tumour behavior can be described using alterations of the p53 gene, and these are also considered an independent factor in natural disease evolution prognosis [17].…”
Background & Aims: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a growing incidence and studies regarding the risk factors or pathogenesis for this type of carcinoma benefit special interest. This study evaluates the correlations between p53 protein expression and clinical and laboratory factors in patients withHCC.
Methods: The study group included 76 patients diagnosed with HCC, either by biopsy or after surgical resection (with curative intent). Immunohistochemistry for p53 protein assessment was performed in all patients. Correlations between the protein 53 expression and age, tumour size, viral infection, liver cirrhosis were performed using the chi-square test (Pearson‘s chi-square) together with the contingency coefficient Kendall‘s coefficient in the tau-b form.
Results: In the study group, 51 patients were male (67%) and 25 female (33%). Cirrhosis due to hepatitis virus B or C infection (in a proportion of 63% of the study group) was not significantly associated with the presence of HCC. Altered expression of p53 protein was observed in 69 patients (91%). The relationship between p53 protein expression and patient sex (p=0.067), age (p=0.531), tumour size (p=0.270), presence of hepatitis B and C viral infections (p=0.7), and of liver cirrhosis (p=0.511) was not statistically significant.
Conclusion: The p53 protein expression was not significantly associated with the demographic characteristics of the patients, tumour size, presence of viral B and C infections or liver cirrhosis.
Abbreviations: HBV: hepatitis B virus; HCV: hepatitis C virus; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; TP53: tumour protein p53; MDR: multi-drug resistance gene.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.