1983
DOI: 10.1007/bf01190792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of the midbrain in interhemispheric integration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Robust homotopic RSFC in areas with sparse callosal connectivity, such as primary visual cortex or amygdala, suggests contributions beyond direct callosal connections (Lowe et al, 1998; Cordes et al, 2000; Vincent et al, 2007; Di Martino et al, 2008; Roy et al, 2009). Functional connectivity between these areas may reflect the contribution of subcortical hubs for interhemispheric communication, including the superior colliculi and brainstem (Lyubimov et al, 1983; Savazzi et al, 2007; Uddin et al, 2008). Conversely, the exceptionally strong VMHC observed in subcortical regions may reflect the contributions of bilateral cortical afferent projections, rather than direct connectivity (Schulte and Muller-Oehring, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robust homotopic RSFC in areas with sparse callosal connectivity, such as primary visual cortex or amygdala, suggests contributions beyond direct callosal connections (Lowe et al, 1998; Cordes et al, 2000; Vincent et al, 2007; Di Martino et al, 2008; Roy et al, 2009). Functional connectivity between these areas may reflect the contribution of subcortical hubs for interhemispheric communication, including the superior colliculi and brainstem (Lyubimov et al, 1983; Savazzi et al, 2007; Uddin et al, 2008). Conversely, the exceptionally strong VMHC observed in subcortical regions may reflect the contributions of bilateral cortical afferent projections, rather than direct connectivity (Schulte and Muller-Oehring, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%