1968
DOI: 10.1038/2201048a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of the Fc Fragment in the Regulation of the Primary Immune Response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was accomplished by removing the Fc portion, and the resulting F(ab02 antibody was tested for its ability to inhibit immunological priming (the establishment of immunological memory). Previous results from this laboratory indicated that F(ab02 antibody was much less effective than whole antibody in inhibiting the primary hemolysin response to sheep erythrocytes (12), and the experiments reported here indicate…”
supporting
confidence: 60%
“…This was accomplished by removing the Fc portion, and the resulting F(ab02 antibody was tested for its ability to inhibit immunological priming (the establishment of immunological memory). Previous results from this laboratory indicated that F(ab02 antibody was much less effective than whole antibody in inhibiting the primary hemolysin response to sheep erythrocytes (12), and the experiments reported here indicate…”
supporting
confidence: 60%
“…The Fc dependence of anti-erythrocyte-mediated AMIS effects has been suggested from the finding that the inhibition can be nonepitope specific, where Abs to one Ag can inhibit the response to another Ag on the same erythrocyte (14, 17, 48-51), as well as from several studies demostrating that F(ab9) 2 fragments could be poor suppressors (17,48,52,53). A study by Karlsson and colleagues (16) using haptenated SRBC showed that anti-hapten mAbs suppress the Ab response in mice lacking the FcgRIIB as well as activating FcgRs or the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…USA 96 (1999)in vitro are memory cells derived from spleens primed with high doses of antigen in vivo. In addition to in vitro studies, the view that IgG-mediated suppression is Fc-dependent was suggested by two types of experimental in vivo findings, both of which are controversial: the inability of F(abЈ) 2 fragments to induce suppression (4,8,17,18) and the ability of IgG to induce non-epitope-specific suppression (3,8,18,23). There are many difficulties in working with F(abЈ) 2 fragments, and, in retrospect, it is hard to explain the reason for the conflicting results discussed earlier.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most straightforward way of analyzing this is to compare the suppressive ability of intact IgG with that of F(abЈ) 2 fragments (where the Fc part has been proteolytically cleaved off). Such studies performed in vivo have given discrepant results, some claiming that F(abЈ) 2 fragments are less suppressive (4,8,17,18) and others claiming that they are equally suppressive as intact IgG (19,20). An indirect way of assessing Fc dependence has been to study whether or not suppression is epitope-specific.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%