2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Tet1/3 Genes and Chromatin Remodeling Genes in Cerebellar Circuit Formation

Abstract: Summary Although mechanisms underlying early steps in cerebellar development are known, evidence is lacking on genetic and epigenetic changes during the establishment of the synaptic circuitry. Using metagene analysis, we report pivotal changes in multiple reactomes of epigenetic pathway genes in cerebellar granule cells (GCs) during circuit formation. During this stage, Tet genes are up-regulated and vitamin C activation of Tet enzymes increases the levels of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) at exon start sites… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
83
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(94 reference statements)
12
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We identified seven novel candidate ARID genes, CACNG7, CARNMT1 / C9orf41, EI24, FXR1, TET3, GARNL3 and TRAPPC10 , for which evidence of their contribution to the corresponding ARID phenotype is strong (Table 5). For novel genes EI24, FXR1 and TET3 a role in ARID is strongly supported by observations in previously published knockout mouse models: Ei24 −/− and Tet3 −/− mice demonstrate defects in brain morphology, neuronal differentiation and/or behavior and motor development, while the Fxr1 knockout results in early death, with lower brain miRNA expression in Fxr1 −/− embryos (Zhao et al 2012; Zhu et al 2016; Xu et al. 2011; Table 5).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…We identified seven novel candidate ARID genes, CACNG7, CARNMT1 / C9orf41, EI24, FXR1, TET3, GARNL3 and TRAPPC10 , for which evidence of their contribution to the corresponding ARID phenotype is strong (Table 5). For novel genes EI24, FXR1 and TET3 a role in ARID is strongly supported by observations in previously published knockout mouse models: Ei24 −/− and Tet3 −/− mice demonstrate defects in brain morphology, neuronal differentiation and/or behavior and motor development, while the Fxr1 knockout results in early death, with lower brain miRNA expression in Fxr1 −/− embryos (Zhao et al 2012; Zhu et al 2016; Xu et al. 2011; Table 5).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In addition to adhesion, CGNs provide an excellent model system to study the cell biological underpinnings of neural development due to their strongly stereotyped developmental programs as they differentiate from cerebellar granule neuron progenitors (GNPs) (75). Intrinsic to this process is the 3D structural reorganization of their nuclear chromatin domains (76,77). To explore this in detail, we first used 3D live cell lattice light sheet microscopy (LLSM) (78) and found that flow sorted GNPs expressing the EGFP-Atoh1 marker of the GNP-state (79, 80) possess significantly larger nuclei than terminally differentiated CGNs ( Figure 7A, B, supplementary note 10).…”
Section: Chromatin Domains and Their Reorganization During Neuronal Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TET family includes proteins that are particularly enriched in brain tissue and differentially expressed in neuronal and glial cells (Globisch et al, 2010;Li and Liu, 2011;Szulwach et al, 2011;Zhao et al, 2014). In neuronal progenitors, TETs are necessary for their differentiation during cortical development (Hahn et al, 2013), and later for axonal growth and functional neuronal circuits formation (Weng et al, 2017;Zhu et al, 2016). In glial cells, the functional role of TETs has not been investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%