2021
DOI: 10.3390/nano11020389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Surface Chemistry in the In Vitro Lung Response to Nanofibrillated Cellulose

Abstract: Wood-derived nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) has emerged as a sustainable material with a wide range of applications and increasing presence in the market. Surface charges are introduced during the preparation of NFC to facilitate the defibrillation process, which may also alter the toxicological properties of NFC. In the present study, we examined the in vitro toxicity of NFCs with five surface chemistries: nonfunctionalized, carboxymethylated, phosphorylated, sulfoethylated, and hydroxypropyltrimethylammoniu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
5
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were obtained for modified cellulose nanofibrillation by Aimonen et al [ 57 ], who investigated whether wood-derived nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) induces intracellular ROS production. Only U-NFC (unmodified) induced a significant increase in ROS formation compared to the negative control at 500 µg/mL after 24 h of exposure, whereas C-NFC (carboxymethylated), H-NFC (hydroxypropyltrimethylammonium), P-NFC (phosphorylated), and S-NFC (sulphoethylated) did not significantly increase the level of ROS for any doses or exposure times.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Similar results were obtained for modified cellulose nanofibrillation by Aimonen et al [ 57 ], who investigated whether wood-derived nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) induces intracellular ROS production. Only U-NFC (unmodified) induced a significant increase in ROS formation compared to the negative control at 500 µg/mL after 24 h of exposure, whereas C-NFC (carboxymethylated), H-NFC (hydroxypropyltrimethylammonium), P-NFC (phosphorylated), and S-NFC (sulphoethylated) did not significantly increase the level of ROS for any doses or exposure times.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This may partly be due to the broad range of CNF properties mainly arising from the fibre source, the extraction/production method, and the surface chemistry [ 8 ]. With the exception of a few studies assessing the toxicological potential of cellulose nanofibrils that only differ in their surface chemistry [ 34 36 ], most of the reported attempts to compare different CNF types have been challenged by the many variables affecting the results [ 20 – 22 , 37 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was demonstrated that the metabolic activity of the cells was not significantly affected by the presence of the NFC materials (concentration range 500–50 μg/mL), and no signs of toxicity in terms of cell membrane damage were observed. In vitro toxicology of the same five CNFs-modified samples was also investigated by Aimonen et al [ 189 ] studied the same materials on human bronchial epithelial (BEAS-2B) cells, when observed that all NFCs samples, regardless of the surface functionalization with different surface charges, showed low cytotoxicity, which did not exceed 10%. Moreover, unmodified NFC (U-NFC) and carboxymethylated NFCs (C-NFC) were able to increase intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation.…”
Section: Toxicological Evaluation and Potential Limitations Of Ncs-based Materialsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Several studies evaluated the influence of surface charges of NCs materials on cytotoxicity effects when considered for medical applications [ 161 , 180 , 187 , 189 ]. CNC with different amounts of carboxyl groups have demonstrated a charge-dependent decrease in mitochondrial activity for higher charge content [ 180 ].…”
Section: Toxicological Evaluation and Potential Limitations Of Ncs-based Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%