2002
DOI: 10.1006/mssp.2002.1480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Structural Details in Altering the Expected Seismic Response of Base-Isolated Bridges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At low strain levels experienced by the bearings due to low amplitude ambient and earthquake-induced excitations, their secant stiffness is much higher than the one at the significantly much higher strain levels associated with the design of the bearings for the strong design earthquakes prescribed by the seismic code. These large differences of the elastomeric bearings stiffnesses between the identified and the design ones are also consistent with the results obtained by Chaudhary et al (2002) for base-isolated bridges and by Stewart et al (1999) for base-isolated buildings. Qualitatively similar results are observed for the bearing stiffness values in Table 3 for the Kavala bridge, although these values are significantly higher than those identified for the Polymylos bridge.…”
Section: Kavala Bridgessupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At low strain levels experienced by the bearings due to low amplitude ambient and earthquake-induced excitations, their secant stiffness is much higher than the one at the significantly much higher strain levels associated with the design of the bearings for the strong design earthquakes prescribed by the seismic code. These large differences of the elastomeric bearings stiffnesses between the identified and the design ones are also consistent with the results obtained by Chaudhary et al (2002) for base-isolated bridges and by Stewart et al (1999) for base-isolated buildings. Qualitatively similar results are observed for the bearing stiffness values in Table 3 for the Kavala bridge, although these values are significantly higher than those identified for the Polymylos bridge.…”
Section: Kavala Bridgessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Extensions for identifying non classically-damped modal models in the frequency domain has also been developed by Chaudhary et al (2000). These methods have been applied to identify the modal characteristics of bridges (Werner et al 1987;Chaudhary 2002) and buildings (Papageorgiou and Lin 1989) by processing input-output earthquake recordings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…temperature and humidity variations (Alampalli, 2000;Xia et al, 2012) and unintentional locking of bridge components (bearings, side stoppers, expansion joints) due to lack of maintenance or fabrication errors etc. (Chaudhary et al 2002;Maalek et al, 2010). Similarly, soil-structure interaction (SSI) (Fraino et al, 2012;Gomez et al, 2013;Chaudhary 2017a), scour around foundations (Ju, 2013;Bao & Liu, 2017), support settlement or liquefaction can change the boundary conditions and impact the modal parameters of the bridge system (Catbas & Aktan, 2002;Lombardi & Bhattacharya, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, secondary components such as rubber bearings, hinge restrainers, side stoppers, and expansion joints if not well taken care of are likely to result in undesirable overall performance of a bridge structure during extreme quake events [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fix-type bearings may break loose if their hinge-restrainer device is sheared off by lateral seismic loading. New techniques in the form of an isolator or a damper device are introduced to replace or enhance conventional bearings [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%