2014
DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0b013e31829af8c0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of SPECT/CT in Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in Patients With Breast Cancer

Abstract: SPECT/CT is a valuable tool for SLND, especially in difficult cases, when planar lymphoscintigraphy shows no SLN or unexpected lymphatic drainage.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(45 reference statements)
2
16
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These visualization rates are in accordance with the reported 63%-88% for breast cancer (14,16,17), 82%-99% for melanoma (18), and 84%-91% for gynecologic and prostate cancers (6,7,21). SPECT/CT improved the visualization rates to 91.3% for breast cancer, 99.2% for melanoma, and 95.3% for pelvic cancer, again in agreement with the reported rates of 81%-97.3% for breast cancer (16)(17)(18), near 100% for melanoma (18), and 92.2%-100% for gynecologic and prostate cancers (6,7,21,22). SPECT/CT depicted SNs in 3.7% of breast cancer, 0.4% of melanoma, and 4.7% of pelvic cancer patients, respectively, with no SNs visualized on PI, representing a considerable number of patients who would have undergone lymphadenectomy if only PI was performed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These visualization rates are in accordance with the reported 63%-88% for breast cancer (14,16,17), 82%-99% for melanoma (18), and 84%-91% for gynecologic and prostate cancers (6,7,21). SPECT/CT improved the visualization rates to 91.3% for breast cancer, 99.2% for melanoma, and 95.3% for pelvic cancer, again in agreement with the reported rates of 81%-97.3% for breast cancer (16)(17)(18), near 100% for melanoma (18), and 92.2%-100% for gynecologic and prostate cancers (6,7,21,22). SPECT/CT depicted SNs in 3.7% of breast cancer, 0.4% of melanoma, and 4.7% of pelvic cancer patients, respectively, with no SNs visualized on PI, representing a considerable number of patients who would have undergone lymphadenectomy if only PI was performed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Unexpected basin drainage sites and unpredictable pathways also hinder interpretation of planar images. Because of its superior contrast, resolution, and display of exact anatomic landmarks, SPECT/CT can overcome most of these limitations (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…İnternal mammaryel lenf bezi diseksiyonunun her merkez tarafından yapılmadığı göz önünde bulundurulduğunda SPECT/BT'nin katkısının sınırlı olacağını bildiren yayınlar da vardır. Meme kanserli hastalar üzerinde yapılmış 11 çalışmanın metaanalizinde SPECT/BT kullanıldığında SLB saptamadaki doğruluğun %63-88'den %89-97'ye yükseldiği; ancak verdiği radyasyon dozu da göz önünde bulundurularak seçilmiş olgularda uygulanmasının daha doğru olacağı bildirilmiştir (59). İntraabdominal hastalıklarda lenf bezi haritalamanın ve cerrahinin daha karmaşık olması nedeni ile SLB saptamada 3 boyutlu görüntülemenin yeri daha fazladır.…”
Section: Spectvespect/btgörüntülemeunclassified
“…Using the SPECT/CT technique in SLNB leads to a slight increase in an effective dose (SPECT effective dose is about 1 mSv for 50 MBq 99m Tc-nanocolloid and the total effective dose SPECT/CT is up to 3mSv according to Law 57 ), thus the use of a hybrid system should always be justified by the expected benefit [58][59][60][61][62] . A low-dose CT scan can help keep the radiation dose to a minimum.…”
Section: Radiation Burden and The Need For Justification For Performimentioning
confidence: 99%