2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcou.2017.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of small Cu nanoparticles in the behaviour of nanocarbon-based electrodes for the electrocatalytic reduction of CO2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mathematically, the ECSA can be described as Equation ECSA =Rnormalf ×Anormalswhere A s is a specific surface area of the smooth surface electrode; R f is roughness factor estimated from the ratio of double‐layer capacitance ( C dl ) for the working electrode. C dl is determined by evaluating the capacitive current related with double‐layer charging at various scanning rates of cyclic voltammetry in electrochemical analysis …”
Section: Intrinsic Factors Of Co2er On Cu‐based Electrocatalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mathematically, the ECSA can be described as Equation ECSA =Rnormalf ×Anormalswhere A s is a specific surface area of the smooth surface electrode; R f is roughness factor estimated from the ratio of double‐layer capacitance ( C dl ) for the working electrode. C dl is determined by evaluating the capacitive current related with double‐layer charging at various scanning rates of cyclic voltammetry in electrochemical analysis …”
Section: Intrinsic Factors Of Co2er On Cu‐based Electrocatalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings may be attributed to the fact that the increasing amount of active sites can produce more hydroxyl groups. 47,48 As the loads of Cu increased, the size of the nanoparticles continued to increase (Fig. S1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The decreasing FE to methanol with increasing potential and current density at higher overpotentials can be allocated to the HER as the dominating reaction. [48] After Ru-based CCM [53] Gas phase 0.46 0.90 0.93 CuÀ TiO 2 /NG based GDE [54] Near neutral (pH = 6.8) À 0.20 À 0.06 19.5 Cu-doped CNTs based GDE [55] Alkaline (pH = 9) 0.28 À 4.75 47.4 CuÀ Bi MOFs based GDE [15] Near neutral (pH = 6.8) blend solution causing densification of the membrane overlayer upon casting and solvent evaporation, as well as the largest water transport reported elsewhere. These results are attributed to the higher accessibility of CO 2 to the catalyst in the uncoated GDE, and confirmed that the membrane over-layer was posing an additional resistance to transport.…”
Section: Electrochemical Reduction Of Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ru-based CCM [53] Gas phase 0.46 0.90 0.93 CuÀ TiO 2 /NG based GDE [54] Near neutral (pH = 6.8) À 0.20 À 0.06 19.5 Cu-doped CNTs based GDE [55] Alkaline (pH = 9) 0.28 À 4.75 47.4 CuÀ Bi MOFs based GDE [15] Near neutral (pH = blend solution causing densification of the membrane overlayer upon casting and solvent evaporation, as well as the largest water transport reported elsewhere. [48] Therefore, this Cu/CS : PVA membrane layer generated the highest current densities generated of all MCE in Table 2, but the catalyst in metallic form seemed to be less accessible for CO 2 and its ionic forms, so the methanol production dropped, in favor of HER as dominant reaction.…”
Section: Electrodementioning
confidence: 99%