1995
DOI: 10.1016/0720-048x(94)00590-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of shoulder ultrasonography in the evaluation of the painful shoulder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tendon rupture was considered partial when part of the tendon was still attached to its insertion; thus, the echostructure of the rotator-cuff muscles was assessed. Fat infiltration, seen as hyperechoic areas within the muscles, was assessed as moderate (area smaller than the remaining muscle) or extensive (area larger than the remaining muscle) [5,6,9,31,32].…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tendon rupture was considered partial when part of the tendon was still attached to its insertion; thus, the echostructure of the rotator-cuff muscles was assessed. Fat infiltration, seen as hyperechoic areas within the muscles, was assessed as moderate (area smaller than the remaining muscle) or extensive (area larger than the remaining muscle) [5,6,9,31,32].…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For 20 studies the mean age was in the range 45-55 years; three studies included on average younger patients; 36,61,64 and four included older patients. 55,56,60,65 Where it was reported, most included a majority of male patients (all except seven studies 44,55,56,59,60,66,67 ), overall mean 59% male.…”
Section: Sample Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One-third of the studies used only arthrography as the reference test and were judged not to have employed a suitable reference standard. 41,43,45,47,50,57,59,65,68,[71][72][73]75 In a further four, 67,70,74,76 arthrography was used as the reference standard in at least some of the patients enrolled -the reference test in these studies was scored as unclear. In all of the remaining studies except one using MRI, 60 the reference standard used was likely to have correctly classified the target condition.…”
Section: Reference Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not surprising, the sensitivity increases as the size of the tear increases, with sensitivity for massive cuff tears (>3 cm) approaching 100% (36). Sonographic detection, localization, and characterization of partial-thickness cuff tears have been described only recently (36)(37)(38)(39)(40). Proposed criteria include a hypoechoic defect that involves the articular or bursal surface, a focal hypoechoic zone within the substance of the cuff, a large linear echogenic focus within the cuff substance, thinning of the cuff (marked during passive movement), and a straight outer cuff border (loss of convexity).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%