Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.81.031602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of shape dependence of dissipation on nuclear fission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the excitation-energy dependence of β can partly arise due to a number of simplifying assumptions which are made to obtain the Kramers fission width. Shape-independent constant values are assumed for the dissipation coefficient and collective inertia of fission degrees of freedom, though these quantities are shape dependent and their values at the saddle point are relevant for dynamics of fission [51,52]. Since the position of the saddle point depends on nuclear spin and the spin distribution of a compound nucleus depends on beam energy, an energy dependence of β may be required to account for these effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the excitation-energy dependence of β can partly arise due to a number of simplifying assumptions which are made to obtain the Kramers fission width. Shape-independent constant values are assumed for the dissipation coefficient and collective inertia of fission degrees of freedom, though these quantities are shape dependent and their values at the saddle point are relevant for dynamics of fission [51,52]. Since the position of the saddle point depends on nuclear spin and the spin distribution of a compound nucleus depends on beam energy, an energy dependence of β may be required to account for these effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculate n pre for the above mentioned reaction with a constant β = 3.5MeV/ . The justification for using a constant β is given in an earlier work [13]. In the upper panel of Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neutron evaporation is one of the dominant decay mode in case of heavy-ion induced reactions. It is often used as the most effective probe to investigate nuclear properties like nuclear temperature [1,2], level density [3,4], fission lifetime [5][6][7][8][9], nuclear dissipation [10][11][12][13][14][15][16], etc. Moreover, in the contest of nuclear power production, neutron multiplicity plays the pivotal role in the operation of nuclear reactors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some recent works have reported how to make an accurate determination for the presaddle dissipation strength by analyzing various observables, such as evaporation residue cross sections [17][18][19] and its spin distributions [20,21], fission probabilities [22,23], and the width of the fission-fragment charge distributions [24,25]. However, the magnitude of presaddle friction is still debated [26][27][28][29]. Relative to numerous work in presaddle dissipation, only very few studies were put on the postsaddle dissipation [30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%