2014
DOI: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000000420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Self-Reported Individual Differences in Preference for and Tolerance of Exercise Intensity in Fitness Testing Performance

Abstract: Performance in fitness tests could depend on factors beyond the bioenergetic and skeletomuscular systems, such as individual differences in preference for and tolerance of different levels of exercise-induced somatosensory stimulation. Although such individual-difference variables could play a role in exercise testing and prescription, they have been understudied. The purpose of these studies was to examine the relationships of self-reported preference for and tolerance of exercise intensity with performance i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
31
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…. Consistent with the conceptualization of preference as a trait, test-retest reliability estimates for the Preference subscale are high (0.67-0.80;Hall et al, 2014). Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) of the scale for the present sample was 0.73.Procedure Session 1: Graded exercise test (GXT).The purpose of the first session was to (a) collect anthropometric and PRETIE-Q data; (b) determine peak aerobic capacity and ventilatory threshold (VT); and (c) familiarize participants with the self-report measures.Upon arrival at the laboratory, participants verbally confirmed no caffeine within 6 h of testing, no vigorous exercise within 24 h of testing, and a normal prior night's sleep (within 1 h of typical sleep duration).…”
supporting
confidence: 52%
“…. Consistent with the conceptualization of preference as a trait, test-retest reliability estimates for the Preference subscale are high (0.67-0.80;Hall et al, 2014). Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) of the scale for the present sample was 0.73.Procedure Session 1: Graded exercise test (GXT).The purpose of the first session was to (a) collect anthropometric and PRETIE-Q data; (b) determine peak aerobic capacity and ventilatory threshold (VT); and (c) familiarize participants with the self-report measures.Upon arrival at the laboratory, participants verbally confirmed no caffeine within 6 h of testing, no vigorous exercise within 24 h of testing, and a normal prior night's sleep (within 1 h of typical sleep duration).…”
supporting
confidence: 52%
“…It is proposed that different cognitive strategies are employed by individuals with a high and low tolerance to combat negative/aversive states during exercise (Tempest & Parfitt, ), yet these remain to be tested. The results reinforce the use of the tolerance scale in exercise testing to help identify individuals susceptible to a negative experience in order to tailor the exercise program to provide a more pleasant and manageable experience (Hall et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Within the dual‐mode model, an individual's ability to maintain prefrontal cortex involvement, particularly at levels of intensity associated with feelings of displeasure and discomfort, is described as tolerance of the intensity of exercise (Ekkekakis, Hall, & Petruzzello, ; Hall, Petruzzello, Ekkekakis, Miller, & Bixby, ). Self‐reported tolerance, a predisposed trait, is described as the ability of an individual to provide cognitive control in order to regulate somatosensory information and is positively associated with affective responses during challenging exercise (above the VT; Ekkekakis et al, ; Ekkekakis, Lind, Hall, & Petruzzello, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors define preference as Ba predisposition to select a particular level of exercise intensity when given the opportunity^(p. 354), and tolerance as Ba trait that influences one's ability to continue exercising at an imposed level of intensity even when the activity becomes uncomfortable or unpleasant^(p. 354). The identification of preference and tolerance as dispositional traits is supported by no change in these scores after a 6-week training program that resulted in improvements in physical fitness (Hall, Petruzzello, Ekkekakis, Miller, & Bixby, 2014). Conceptual validation of the scales (Ekkekakis et al, 2005) showed that neither preference nor tolerance was associated with affective responses reported during exercise at intensities below VT.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%