2017
DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Secondary Prophylaxis with Valganciclovir in the Prevention of Recurrent Cytomegalovirus Disease in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
32
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of note, the duration of DNAemia was nearly identical in the two groups which argues against selection bias. Although this observation has been previously reported in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, [9][10][11] to the best of our knowledge this is the first study demonstrating the lack of benefit of CMV maintenance therapy in HCT recipients. The recurrence rate while off therapy in this cohort of allogeneic HCT recipients (73%) was higher than that reported in the published studies in SOT population with recurrence rates ranging from 23% to 33%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Of note, the duration of DNAemia was nearly identical in the two groups which argues against selection bias. Although this observation has been previously reported in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, [9][10][11] to the best of our knowledge this is the first study demonstrating the lack of benefit of CMV maintenance therapy in HCT recipients. The recurrence rate while off therapy in this cohort of allogeneic HCT recipients (73%) was higher than that reported in the published studies in SOT population with recurrence rates ranging from 23% to 33%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The recurrence rate while off therapy in this cohort of allogeneic HCT recipients (73%) was higher than that reported in the published studies in SOT population with recurrence rates ranging from 23% to 33%. 9,10,[12][13][14][15][16] In SOT patients, secondary prophylaxis does not lead to long-term protection and in fact cell-mediated immunity may better predict the likelihood of recurrence of CMV. 10,17 We observed that without exception all the patients with symptomatic CMV disease during the initial CMV viremia experienced recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, post‐prophylaxis (late‐onset) CMV reactivation still occurs, contributing to graft loss and premature death via its direct and indirect effects . Recurrent disease occurs in up to 30% of patients despite successful treatment for CMV, and while significant efforts have been made to identify risk factors for relapse and implement strategies to reduce it, these seem to have had minimal impact on recurrence rates . While it is clear from prior studies that patients who develop CMV disease have a higher risk of death than those who do not, the impact of recurrent disease on survival is less well characterized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have previously shown that secondary prophylaxis delays but do not prevent relapse, and that low absolute lymphocyte count at the time of CMV treatment completion is associated with recurrence . The aim of this study was to explore the impact of recurrent CMV infection on long‐term survival in a retrospective cohort of heart, liver, and kidney transplant recipients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%