2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(01)00739-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of sample adequacy in fine needle aspiration biopsy of palpable breast lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The proportion of inadequate sampling as reported by different studies varies from 9 to 18% 14 . Our study result is comparable to study of Zarbo, et al 14 who had reported that 17% of 2,254 aspirates in his institutional study were unsatisfactory for evaluation. Maintaining suction as the needle is withdrawn from the breast, leads to loss of cells in to the syringe at the time of withdrawal.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proportion of inadequate sampling as reported by different studies varies from 9 to 18% 14 . Our study result is comparable to study of Zarbo, et al 14 who had reported that 17% of 2,254 aspirates in his institutional study were unsatisfactory for evaluation. Maintaining suction as the needle is withdrawn from the breast, leads to loss of cells in to the syringe at the time of withdrawal.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…By different studies also it has been concluded that accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in diagnosing the breast tumors increases by performing repeat aspiration in a lump for which previously been reported as inadequate sampling 14 16 . This is not surprising as the needle tract is invariably removed with definitive surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportion of inadequate sampling as reported by different studies varies from 9 to 18%. 8 Our study result is comparable to study of Zarbo et al, 8 who had reported that 17% of 2,254 aspirates in his institutional study were unsatisfactory for evaluation. Maintaining suction as the needle is withdrawn from the breast, leads to loss of cells in to the syringe at the time of withdrawal.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Feichter et al (1997), observaram que a CAAF é um bom método de triagem para a realização da biópsia, pois sua acurácia varia entre 82-91% de eficácia em comparação ao resultado da histologia. A técnica é comumente usada na punção de massas superficiais e discerníveis radiograficamente (SAXE et al, 2001).…”
Section: Diagnóstico Citopatológicounclassified