In the early to middle 1980s, there was an effort to improve interpretation of the factors controlling exposure to aquatic species, including benthos. These approaches used either thermodynamics or toxicokinetics to describe the exposure. In the "Top 100" list for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry [1], there are good examples of both approaches. The information provided by the 2 methods varied depending on the question being asked. The thermodynamic approach focused on the maximum exposure that could be obtained given the chemical activity of the compound when the organism was in equilibrium with the exposure environment. Conversely, the kinetic approach focused on the dynamics and the impact of environmental conditions affecting exposure. In the present paper, we examine the development of toxicokinetics as a means to enhance information on exposure, including issues of bioavailability and toxicity of organic contaminants to aquatic organisms.The kinetic approach for studying exposure was useful for examining process-associated information, which included issues dictating bioavailability, rates of exposure, and internal processes such as biotransformation, leading to a better understanding of the specific factors controlling the rate and extent of accumulation. The use of kinetic approaches also becomes important when there is a desire to interpret dynamic exposures, such as pulsed or episodic exposures to organisms. To this end, there were many studies that examined the toxicokinetics of contaminants in aquatic organisms, and various models were used to describe the results of environmental conditions on the exposure process. Thus, it became important to establish the connection between the models that were being employed, and the underlying terminology and assumptions to allow those interested in the impact of environmental variables on exposure to understand what each of the models was describing [2]. The models in use were generally simple firstorder models, which used kinetic constants and distinguished the differences in the coefficients under different assumptions or experimental conditions. For instance, one of the important distinctions between the models was the connection between concentration-and mass balance-based models. The uptake rate coefficient from the mass balance model was system-dependent and had to be translated to a system-independent form by adjusting for the exposure volume and mass to be compared across studies with different mass to volume ratios. Another important distinction was the connection between traditional rate coefficient models and those based on fugacity terminology. The terminology of the models both described the same processes, but the fugacity model was dependent on the transfer coefficient (D) and fugacity to yield the uptake. Connecting the two types of models for toxicokinetics allowed for additional comparisons among studies. Finally, models describing the connection between physiological processes and toxicokinetics, called physiologically based pharmacokine...