Background
Mechanisms of atrial fibrillation (AF) initiation are incompletely understood. We hypothesized that rate-dependent changes (restitution) in action potential duration (APD) and activation latency are central targets for clinical interventions that induce AF. We tested this hypothesis using clinical experiments and computer models.
Methods and Results
In 50 patients (20 persistent, 23 paroxysmal AF, 7 controls), we used monophasic action potential catheters to define left atrial APD restitution, activation latency and AF incidence from premature extrastimuli. Isoproterenol (n=14), adenosine (n=10), or rapid pacing (n=36) were then initiated to determine impact on these parameters. Compared with baseline in AF patients, isoproterenol and rapid pacing decreased activation latency (64±14vs 31±13 vs 24±14 ms, p<0.05), steepened maximum APD restitution slope (0.8±0.7 vs 1.7±0.5 vs 1.1±0.5, p<0.05), and increased AF incidence (12% vs 64% vs 84%, p<0.05). Conversely, adenosine shortened APD (p<0.05), yet increased activation latency (86±27 ms, p=0.002) so that maximum APD restitution slope did not steepen (1.0±0.5, p=NS) and AF incidence was unchanged (10%, p=NS). In controls, no intervention steepened APD restitution or initiated AF. Computational modeling revealed that isoproterenol steepened APD restitution by increased ICaL and decreased activation latency via enhanced IKr inactivation, while rapid pacing steepened APD restitution via increased IK1.
Conclusions
Steep APD restitution is a common pathway for AF initiation by isoproterenol and tachycardia, via reduced activation latency that enables engagement of steep APD restitution at rapid rates. Modeling suggests AF initiation from each intervention uses distinct ionic mechanisms. This insight may help design interventions to prevent AF.