2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2006.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of receptor interaction in the mode of action of insecticidal Cry and Cyt toxins produced by Bacillus thuringiensis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
81
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
81
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Current theories of the mode of action of the Cry1Ac suggest that the toxin binds to GPIanchored proteins prior to insertion into the membrane but it is unclear whether the anchor has any role in that binding Gómez et al, 2007;Pigott and Ellar, 2007). In at least one case the GPI-anchor is not required for binding since an APN from M. sexta was still able to bind Cry1Ac after cleavage of its anchor (Lu and Adang, 1996), however, that particular APN (from class I) has the C-terminal, mucin-like sequence with demonstrated GalNAc content (Knight et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Current theories of the mode of action of the Cry1Ac suggest that the toxin binds to GPIanchored proteins prior to insertion into the membrane but it is unclear whether the anchor has any role in that binding Gómez et al, 2007;Pigott and Ellar, 2007). In at least one case the GPI-anchor is not required for binding since an APN from M. sexta was still able to bind Cry1Ac after cleavage of its anchor (Lu and Adang, 1996), however, that particular APN (from class I) has the C-terminal, mucin-like sequence with demonstrated GalNAc content (Knight et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further binding investigations for both the cadherin-like and GPI-anchored proteins have led to proposals that both protein groups interact with Cry toxins to form pores. Models were suggested where binding commences with the cadherin, and after some toxin modification, binding to GPI-anchored receptors follows, with Nacetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) moieties regarded as essential for the binding of Cry1Ac to GPI-anchored proteins and in the formation of pores Gómez et al, 2007;Jurat-Fuentes and Adang, 2006). GalNAc inhibited 68% of binding to posterior midgut brush border membrane vesicles (BBMVs) from H. armigera but had only slight effect on the binding of Cry1Ac to anterior midgut BBMVs (Rodrigo-Simón et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For several Cry toxins, it has been shown that the activated toxins bind to specific receptors lining the apical brush-border membranes of midgut epithelial cells and possibly undergo conformational changes and oligomerisation (Pigott MMBR 2007) [9] (Gómez Peptides 2007) [10]. One widely accepted hypothesis is that this is followed by membrane insertion and pore formation, causing a net influx of ions and water that leads to osmotic cell lysis, resulting in severe damage of the midgut and eventual death of the insect larvae (Knowles AIP 1994) [11] (Whalon AIBP 2003) [12].…”
Section: Introduction: Protein-based Bioinsec-ticidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cry1A monomers then bind to the primary receptor that has been identified in several species as a cadherin protein that is located in the microvilli of columnar midgut cells. This interaction provokes a conformational change of the toxin that facilitates further proteolytic cleavage of the domain I N-terminal helix ␣-1, resulting in toxin oligomerization (14,15). In favor of this model, engineered modified Cry1Ab and Cry1Ac toxins lacking helix ␣-1 have been shown to retain toxicity to resistant insects that have mutations affecting the cadherin gene (16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%