2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10397-014-0841-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of prophylactic antibiotics in endoscopic gynaecological surgery; a consensus proposal

Abstract: Surgical site infection can result in increased morbidity for the patient, prolonged hospital stay and hospital readmission. Preoperative antibiotics reduce the incidence of such infections, particularly in open surgery. Universal use of antibiotic prophylaxis, however, is not recommended due to the risks of adverse reactions, generation of resistant bacteria and additional cost. Endoscopic procedures carry low risk of wound contamination and infection. Limited data suggest wide variability in antibiotic proph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study will use a randomized, double-blind design to assess SSI rates, and includes a placebo group. Minas et al in another recent review of literature concluded that there is a paucity of evidence to address the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in gynecologic hysteroscopy, laparoscopy and robotic surgery [28]. Morrill et al concluded that antibiotic prophylaxis for laparoscopic surgery does not provide a significant benefit and questioned the applicability of studies that were published some time ago [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study will use a randomized, double-blind design to assess SSI rates, and includes a placebo group. Minas et al in another recent review of literature concluded that there is a paucity of evidence to address the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in gynecologic hysteroscopy, laparoscopy and robotic surgery [28]. Morrill et al concluded that antibiotic prophylaxis for laparoscopic surgery does not provide a significant benefit and questioned the applicability of studies that were published some time ago [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%