Abstract:Studies on porous trailing edges, manufactured with open-cell Ni-Cr-Al foams with sub-millimeter pore sizes, have shown encouraging results for the mitigation of turbulent boundary-layer trailing-edge noise. However, the achieved noise mitigation is typically dependent upon the pore geometry, which is fixed after manufacturing. In this study, a step to control the aeroacoustics effect of such porous trailing edges is taken, by applying a polymeric coating onto the internal foam structure. Using this method, th… Show more
“…By multiplying u i by Equation (20) and ρ , by Equation (21), taking the divergence of the sum, subtracting time derivation of the mass conservation law in Equation (20) and adding −c 2 0 ∂ 2 ρ ∂x i ∂x i with respect to the equation both sides, we finally obtain an approximation wave equation with the velocity divergence as the sound source:…”
Section: Acoustic Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the aforementioned applications, the trailing edge noise is the most relevant noise source, especially at low Mach numbers since the turbulent fluctuations are scattered efficiently over a solid trailing edge [7]. For alleviating this dominant trailing edge noise, several passive noise-mitigation solutions such as trailing-edge brushes [8,9], sinusoidal and sawtooth serration [6,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16], slits [17,18], and porous treatments [19][20][21] have been proposed. Among these passive methods, sinusoidal and sawtooth trailing edge serrations have been of important interest for researchers [3,6].…”
Trailing-edge serrations have proven to be valid applications of trailing edge noise mitigation for an airfoil, while the physical noise reduction mechanism has not been adequately studied. We performed simulations employing Large-eddy simulation and the Lighthill–Curle method to reveal the variation in the hydrodynamic field and sound source due to the trailing edge serrations. The grid resolution and computational results were validated against experimental data. The simulation results show that: the trailing edge serrations impede the growth of spanwise vortices and promote the development of streamwise vortices near the trailing edge and the wake; the velocity fluctuations in the vertical cross-section of the streamwise direction near the trailing edge are reduced for the serrated airfoil, thereby obviously reducing the strength of the pressure fluctuations near the trailing edge; and the trailing edge serrations decrease the distribution of the sound source near the trailing edge and reduce the local peak value of sound pressure level in a specific frequency range as well as the overall sound pressure level. Moreover, we observed that, in the flow around the NACA0012 airfoil, the location where the strong sound source distribution begins to appear is in good agreement with the location where the separated boundary layer reattaches. It is therefore effective to reduce trailing edge noise by applying serrations on the upstream of the reattachment point.
“…By multiplying u i by Equation (20) and ρ , by Equation (21), taking the divergence of the sum, subtracting time derivation of the mass conservation law in Equation (20) and adding −c 2 0 ∂ 2 ρ ∂x i ∂x i with respect to the equation both sides, we finally obtain an approximation wave equation with the velocity divergence as the sound source:…”
Section: Acoustic Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the aforementioned applications, the trailing edge noise is the most relevant noise source, especially at low Mach numbers since the turbulent fluctuations are scattered efficiently over a solid trailing edge [7]. For alleviating this dominant trailing edge noise, several passive noise-mitigation solutions such as trailing-edge brushes [8,9], sinusoidal and sawtooth serration [6,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16], slits [17,18], and porous treatments [19][20][21] have been proposed. Among these passive methods, sinusoidal and sawtooth trailing edge serrations have been of important interest for researchers [3,6].…”
Trailing-edge serrations have proven to be valid applications of trailing edge noise mitigation for an airfoil, while the physical noise reduction mechanism has not been adequately studied. We performed simulations employing Large-eddy simulation and the Lighthill–Curle method to reveal the variation in the hydrodynamic field and sound source due to the trailing edge serrations. The grid resolution and computational results were validated against experimental data. The simulation results show that: the trailing edge serrations impede the growth of spanwise vortices and promote the development of streamwise vortices near the trailing edge and the wake; the velocity fluctuations in the vertical cross-section of the streamwise direction near the trailing edge are reduced for the serrated airfoil, thereby obviously reducing the strength of the pressure fluctuations near the trailing edge; and the trailing edge serrations decrease the distribution of the sound source near the trailing edge and reduce the local peak value of sound pressure level in a specific frequency range as well as the overall sound pressure level. Moreover, we observed that, in the flow around the NACA0012 airfoil, the location where the strong sound source distribution begins to appear is in good agreement with the location where the separated boundary layer reattaches. It is therefore effective to reduce trailing edge noise by applying serrations on the upstream of the reattachment point.
“…Hedayati et al [27] manufacture their trailing edge with the open-cell Ni-Cr-Al foam. This type of metal foam is characterised by sub-millimetre pore size.…”
This paper presents a sensitivity and parametric study of the sound generation at the non-tortuous and wall-normal permeable trailing edge of an aerofoil. Design parameters for the porous properties include the porosity, pore-size and porous-coverage. For a combination of large pore-size, small porosity and large porous-coverage, wake vortex shedding is likely to be triggered, and either sharp tone or broadened tone will dominate the radiated field. Using the appropriate hydrodynamic and geometrical length scales, the radiated spectra for the tones are found to follow the Strouhal number relationship, thus allow a reasonably accurate prediction of the primary tone frequency. These extraneous tones can potentially undermine the current porous trailing edge concept. Still, they can also be avoided if the porous parameters are mostly of small pore-size (sub-millimetre), medium to large porosity or small porouscoverage. Under these porous settings, better spatially distributed permeable air will seep through the surface and disrupt the generation mechanism of the turbulent boundary layer, which then translate into a lower level of turbulent broadband noise radiation. The most optimised non-tortuous, wall-normal permeable trailing edge tested in the current study can achieve a maximum of 7 dB reduction for the turbulent broadband noise. Considering that the primary trailing edge noise source is situated very near to the edge, a targeted approach (i.e. small porous-coverage) is already sufficient to achieve significant trailing edge broadband noise reduction.
“…Particularly, acoustic metamaterials can manipulate sound and elastic waves both spatially and spectrally in unpreceded ways [2]. Such properties include super-focusing [3], super-lensing [4], active membrane structures [5,6], cloaking [7,8], phononic plates [9], fluid cavities separated by piezoelectric boundaries [10], and tunable noise attenuation based on Helmholtz resonators [11][12][13][14][15]. The capability of metamaterials to tune their physical behavior just based on their geometrical characteristics offers a great benefit over conventional materials for application in various high-demand industries such as aerospace, automobile, and construction.…”
Metamaterials are periodic structures which offer physical properties not found in nature. Particularly, acoustic metamaterials can manipulate sound and elastic waves both spatially and spectrally in unpreceded ways. Acoustic metamaterials can generate arbitrary acoustic bandgaps by scattering sound waves, which is a superior property for insulation properties. In this study, one dimension of the resonators (depth of cavity) was altered by means of a pneumatic actuation system. To this end, metamaterial slabs were additively manufactured and connected to a proportional pressure control unit. The noise reduction performance of active acoustic metamaterials in closed- and open-space configurations was measured in different control conditions. The pneumatic actuation system was used to vary the pressure behind pistons inside each cell of the metamaterial, and as a result to vary the cavity depth of each unit cell. Two pressures were considered, P = 0.05 bar, which led to higher depth of the cavities, and P = 0.15 bar, which resulted in lower depth of cavities. The results showed that by changing the pressure from P = 0.05 (high cavity depth) to P = 0.15 (low cavity depth), the acoustic bandgap can be shifted from a frequency band of 150–350 Hz to a frequency band of 300–600 Hz. The pneumatically-actuated acoustical metamaterial gave a peak attenuation of 20 dB (at 500 Hz) in the closed system and 15 dB (at 500 Hz) in the open system. A step forward would be to tune different unit cells of the metamaterial with different pressure levels (and therefore different cavity depths) in order to target a broader range of frequencies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.