SUMMARY
The concept of plant ‘ventilating pressures’ is considered by comparing the pressures required to cause various rates of gas‐How through rhizomes of Phragmites australis venting either beneath water or into air. The resistances to pressurized flow in nodal and internodal regions are quantified, and the pressure: flow data analysed mathematically to deduce effective pore‐space diameter in the nodal diaphragms, and the diffusive resistances of the diaphragms and intemodes.
The value traditionally termed ‘ventilating‐pressure’, the minimum pressure required to cause a venting of gas into water, is shown to be a function of surface tension effects at the venting surfaces and not a measure of gas‐flow resistance within the plant.
With venting to air rather than water, gas flows occurred at all applied pressures greater than atmospheric and pressure‐flow resistance within the plant was determined from the gas flow: pressure relationship. Pressure‐flow resistance was much greater in the nodal pith diaphragms (6–210 MPa s m−3) than in internodal pith cavities (0.001 5.040 MPa s m−3; path length, 100 mm) and was chiefly a function of pore‐size, pore numbers and path length within the small stellate parenchyma layers of the diaphragms. The domed nature of diaphragms reduces resistance by increasing the pore numbers. The effective pore diameters within the small stellate parenchyma of the diaphragms were estimated from the pressure: flow data using a modification of the Poiseulle equation. The values obtained ranged from c. 3.7 μm, and corresponded closely with diameters found previously by scanning electron microscopy.
It is concluded that both large and small stellate parenchyma must contribute significantly to the diffusive resistance of tile diaphragms in accordance with path lengths and porosity; and that, in contrast with pressure‐flow resistance, the internodes because of their length, should have the greater impedance. Estimated values for the pith diaphragm diffusive resistance were 1–13 Ms m−3 (path length, 1.7–3 mm), whilst pith cavity resistances, (path length 100 mm), were 25–1100 Ms m−3. In the latter, the variation was attributable chiefly to the widely varying rhizome diameters: porosities of wide rhizomes were greater than those of narrower ones because of large pith cavities. The fractional porosity due to cortical aerenchyma channels (10–20%) was not related to rhizome thickness.
It is concluded that gas‐flow resistances in Phragmites are sufficiently small to allow for substantial long‐distance transport by convection or diffusion.