Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2011
DOI: 10.1521/psyc.2011.74.1.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Pain Personification in Pain-Related Depression: An Object Relations Perspective

Abstract: Chronic pain may be internalized and integrated into the sufferer's object-relations, thereby influencing sufferer's depression. To examine this, fifty-five women suffering from chronic pain were assessed as to their pain-personification, pain intensity, depression, anxiety, and pain related distress. The assessment protocol included an innovative self-report measure, the Pain Personification Questionnaire (PPQ), measuring pain as an internal "bad" object. Controlling for level of pain intensity, we found that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, references to being in so much pain ‘you’d think you were dying’ may reflect a perception of pain being so intense that it could only be communication through death itself (Munday et al ., 2020). Such negative personification of pain is a demonstrated predictor of pain‐related distress, depression, and illness intrusiveness (Schattner & Shahar, 2011) and could indicate catastrophic thinking and concerns that warrant additional attention, therefore highlighting targets for future work to examine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, references to being in so much pain ‘you’d think you were dying’ may reflect a perception of pain being so intense that it could only be communication through death itself (Munday et al ., 2020). Such negative personification of pain is a demonstrated predictor of pain‐related distress, depression, and illness intrusiveness (Schattner & Shahar, 2011) and could indicate catastrophic thinking and concerns that warrant additional attention, therefore highlighting targets for future work to examine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stemming from these understandings, and combined with the illness personification theory (Schattner et al, 2008;Shahar & Lerman, 2013), a new research arena has emerged, which sheds light on the ways in which individuals who experienced trauma personify their bodily signals. According to the Illness Personification theory, first concieved by Shahar and colleagues (Schattner et al, 2008;Schattner & Shahar, 2011;Shahar & Lerman, 2013), individuals tend to ascribe humanlike characteristics to illness-related symptoms in a way that is relevant to the self (Shahar & Lerman, 2013). As such, individuals tend to develop a sort of "relationship" with their chronic medical condition, reflecting the narrative in which the self interacts with the illness (Schattner & Shahar, 2011;Shahar & Lerman, Tsur NP2519 4 Journal of Interpersonal Violence 00(0)…”
Section: Chronic Pain Personificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Personification is defined as a tendency to mentalize-either positively or negatively-inanimate objects, often due to the need to reduce uncertainty and acquire "control" of external surroundings (Epley et al, 2008;Waytz et al, 2010). Individuals display high levels of personification when encountering acute and chronic stressors such as natural disasters or chronic illness (Jung et al, 2014;Lerman and Shahar, 2013;Schattner and Shahar, 2011). In the context of mass vaccination, personifying the government agency may entail experiencing this agency either as caring and nurturing or-alternatively-as deficient, or even as having malicious intent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%