2017
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/aa627f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of oxygen vacancies on light emission mechanisms in SrTiO3induced by high-energy particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
40
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, they have provided valuable information about the occurrence of in-gap levels for self-trapped carriers and excitons, as well as for key impurities and defects (e.g., oxygen vacancies). A variety of excitation sources, including X-rays, electrons and ion-beams have been used for comparison (see Table 1 in [32]). Depending on sample, excitation conditions, and measuring temperature, several overlapped Gaussian emissions centered at 2.0 eV, 2.5 eV, and 2.8 eV are generally distinguished [32].…”
Section: Luminescence Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, they have provided valuable information about the occurrence of in-gap levels for self-trapped carriers and excitons, as well as for key impurities and defects (e.g., oxygen vacancies). A variety of excitation sources, including X-rays, electrons and ion-beams have been used for comparison (see Table 1 in [32]). Depending on sample, excitation conditions, and measuring temperature, several overlapped Gaussian emissions centered at 2.0 eV, 2.5 eV, and 2.8 eV are generally distinguished [32].…”
Section: Luminescence Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of excitation sources, including X-rays, electrons and ion-beams have been used for comparison (see Table 1 in [32]). Depending on sample, excitation conditions, and measuring temperature, several overlapped Gaussian emissions centered at 2.0 eV, 2.5 eV, and 2.8 eV are generally distinguished [32]. Remarkably, the (red) 2.0 eV band has only been clearly observed for heavily strained and amorphous samples suggesting that it is closely related to structural disorder [31,42,43].…”
Section: Luminescence Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The electronic and optical behavior is presently an active and controversial field of research [6][7][8][9]. The luminescence spectra under a variety of excitation sources, including UV light [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18], X-rays [19], electrons [20] and ion-beams [21,22], show three main bands centered at 2.0 eV (red), 2.5 eV (green) and 2.8 eV (blue). A detailed study using ion-beam irradiation experiments has concluded that the red band is due to d-d transitions between an excited level in the conduction band (CB) with mostly 3d(t 2g ) character and an in-gap 3d(e g ) level associated with an electron selftrapped as Ti 3+ adjacent to an oxygen vacancy (Ti 3+ -V O center) [23][24][25][26][27][28], as illustrated in Figure S1 (see supplementary data online).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%