2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2014.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of overpressurized fluid and fluid-driven fractures in forming fracture networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 The first trend focuses on improving the computational aspects of the models by employing state-of-the-art numerical techniques to develop models that overcome the limitations of their existing counterparts. Examples are studies that employed different variations of the boundary integrals method, [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] finite element method, [12][13][14][15][16] extended/generalized finite elements, [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] phase field methods, [31][32][33][34][35][36] and hybrid finite element/eXtended finite element-distinct element techniques (FEM-DEM or XFEM-DEM) [37][38][39][40] to develop 2D and 3D HF models. Additionally, some recent studies have coupled boundary integral or extended finite element methods with fracture tip asymptotes and presented efficient multiscale models of HFs under different propagation regimes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The first trend focuses on improving the computational aspects of the models by employing state-of-the-art numerical techniques to develop models that overcome the limitations of their existing counterparts. Examples are studies that employed different variations of the boundary integrals method, [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] finite element method, [12][13][14][15][16] extended/generalized finite elements, [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] phase field methods, [31][32][33][34][35][36] and hybrid finite element/eXtended finite element-distinct element techniques (FEM-DEM or XFEM-DEM) [37][38][39][40] to develop 2D and 3D HF models. Additionally, some recent studies have coupled boundary integral or extended finite element methods with fracture tip asymptotes and presented efficient multiscale models of HFs under different propagation regimes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If two equal‐size new fractures are very close, one may suppress the growth of the other or both might merge to form a larger fracture. Actually simultaneous fluid‐driven growth can be possible if two fractures have different initial sizes [ Zhang and Jeffrey , ]; however, this situation is not applicable to fracture nucleation. For the results presented below, the minimum new fracture spacing D is chosen as 0.1 m. If two starter fractures are within a separation less than 0.1 m, only one fracture is considered.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[]. During hydraulic fracturing stimulation of hydrocarbon and geothermal reservoirs, the injection of fluids causes transient increases of fluid pressure to enhance fracture connectivity through fluid‐driven crack growth [ Rutledge and Phillips , ; Zhang and Jeffrey , ]. In addition, deposition of quartz and other minerals from circulating fluids in the crust can seal fracture walls and result in a buildup in fluid pressure upstream of these sealed sections [ Ramsay , ; Fyfe et al ., ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique creates simulated statistical networks (Dowd et al, 2009) to solve the disparity between three-dimensional flow and two-dimensional fracture observations in the field. Modelling in three dimensions allows geologists to treat each fracture as a discrete entity irrespective of its -full or partial -connectivity, increasing the predictive power of the method (Zhang and Jeffrey, 2014). The method discretizes the area associated with each…”
Section: 4-discrete Fracture Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%