2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4215(02)00127-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of nuclear fusion in future energy systems and the environment under future uncertainties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Fusion of light atomic nuclei (e.g., protium, deuterium, or tritium) theoretically could supply power indefinitely without long-lived radioactive wastes as the products are isotopes of helium (Ongena and Van Oost, 2006;Tokimatsu et al, 2003); however, it would produce short-lived waste that needs to be removed from the reactor core to avoid interference with operations, and it is unlikely to be commercially available for at least another 50-100 years (Tokimatsu et al, 2003;Barré , 1999;Hammond, 1996), long after we will have needed to transition to alternative energy sources. By contrast, wind and solar power are available today, will last indefinitely, and pose no serious risks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fusion of light atomic nuclei (e.g., protium, deuterium, or tritium) theoretically could supply power indefinitely without long-lived radioactive wastes as the products are isotopes of helium (Ongena and Van Oost, 2006;Tokimatsu et al, 2003); however, it would produce short-lived waste that needs to be removed from the reactor core to avoid interference with operations, and it is unlikely to be commercially available for at least another 50-100 years (Tokimatsu et al, 2003;Barré , 1999;Hammond, 1996), long after we will have needed to transition to alternative energy sources. By contrast, wind and solar power are available today, will last indefinitely, and pose no serious risks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to show the required COE together with the introduction year, because it would be useless to develop a fusion power plant at a reasonable COE after another alternative energy source has been introduced as the backbone energy source. Recently, the potential of fusion energy in a long-term world energy scenario has been investigated, and the introduction year and the consequent share for the fusion energy has been estimated together with the break-even COE [16,17]. In the present study, future uncertainties, e.g.…”
Section: How To Clarify Forthcoming Break-even Conditions ?mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…energy demand scenarios and capacity utilization ratios of options in energy/environment technologies, are considered in several different world energy scenarios. This analysis was carried out by using a long-term world energy and environmental model (this model is used for IPCC post SRES activity [18]) and estimated that the break-even price of the fusion energy for introduction in the year 2050 under the constraint of 550 ppmv CO 2 concentration (twice level at the Industrial Revolution) would be in a range from 65 mill/kWh to 135 mill/kWh (1000 mill = 1 dollar) [17]. The width of the break-even price range is derived largely from uncertainties about the future world energy scenario.…”
Section: How To Clarify Forthcoming Break-even Conditions ?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overcapacity caused by trade conflict obstructs technological progress and delays the deployment of PV power generation. Learning-by-doing also includes additional mechanisms, such as learning-by-operating and learning-by-implementing [15,57,58].…”
Section: Deployment Stagementioning
confidence: 99%