2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of novel ternary nanocomposites polypropylene in nuclear radiation attenuation properties: In-depth simulation study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mass attenuation coefficient for gamma radiation was slightly increased, which was attributed to the low content of the fillers and their low atomic number [85]. However, the use of a binary filler system does not always produce the expected increment of the shielding properties; those fillers with higher Z will have a more dominant effect on the radiation attenuation [86].…”
Section: Composites As An Approach To Enhance the Performance Of Polymers Against He-emrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mass attenuation coefficient for gamma radiation was slightly increased, which was attributed to the low content of the fillers and their low atomic number [85]. However, the use of a binary filler system does not always produce the expected increment of the shielding properties; those fillers with higher Z will have a more dominant effect on the radiation attenuation [86].…”
Section: Composites As An Approach To Enhance the Performance Of Polymers Against He-emrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effective atomic number is a parameter affected by Compton scattering interaction process of the composite and can be calculated as [34]…”
Section: Effective Atomic Number (Z Eff )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, both EBF and EABF have a similar behavior (according to the dominant processes) against photon energy for various energy levels. Such that the highest buildup factors were observed in the middle energy levels, where the Compton scattering is the dominant process, while the lowest buildup factors can be seen in the low and high energy levels where the photon absorption mechanism is a dominating process [53][54][55][56]. 12 shows a comparison between EBF and EABF and their variations with the effective atomic number and energy of 1 MeV and depth of 5 mfp.…”
Section: Radiation Attenuation Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%