2022
DOI: 10.1002/npr2.12252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of noradrenergic transmission within the ventral bed nucleus of the stria terminalis in nicotine withdrawal‐induced aversive behavior

Abstract: Cessation of smoking induces nicotine withdrawal symptoms including anxiety, depression, and dysphoria, which can lead to smoking relapse. 1 Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the neural mechanisms underlying nicotine withdrawal-induced negative emotions. The bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) has been implicated in the regulation of negative emotional states, such as fear, anxiety, and aversion. 2,3 The BNST receives a dense projection of noradrenergic fibers from the A1/ A2 cell groups. 4 We repor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Or, it might be that the threat-anticipation paradigm used here and in prior human psychophysiology studies is suboptimal ("wrong" human assay). Most of the anxiety assays used in rodent models of addictionconditioned-place avoidance, elevated-plus maze, open field, shock-probe burying-focus on instrumental defensive behaviors emitted over extended assessment periods (5-15 minutes) (Arakaki & Minami, 2022;George et al, 2007;Patel, Vishwakarma, Patel, & Jain, 2021;Qi et al, 2016;Zhao-Shea et al, 2015). In contrast, the Maryland Threat Countdown and other popular threat-anticipation assays (e.g., NPU, Pavlovian threat conditioning) are structured as randomly intermixed, relatively brief (5-90 s) periods of safety and threat (Grillon et al, 2007;.…”
Section: Kim Et Al Nicotine Abstinence Amplifies Withdrawal and Distr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Or, it might be that the threat-anticipation paradigm used here and in prior human psychophysiology studies is suboptimal ("wrong" human assay). Most of the anxiety assays used in rodent models of addictionconditioned-place avoidance, elevated-plus maze, open field, shock-probe burying-focus on instrumental defensive behaviors emitted over extended assessment periods (5-15 minutes) (Arakaki & Minami, 2022;George et al, 2007;Patel, Vishwakarma, Patel, & Jain, 2021;Qi et al, 2016;Zhao-Shea et al, 2015). In contrast, the Maryland Threat Countdown and other popular threat-anticipation assays (e.g., NPU, Pavlovian threat conditioning) are structured as randomly intermixed, relatively brief (5-90 s) periods of safety and threat (Grillon et al, 2007;.…”
Section: Kim Et Al Nicotine Abstinence Amplifies Withdrawal and Distr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among nicotine-dependent rodents, acute deprivation is associated with heightened signs of anxiety across a range of assays and defensive behaviors (e.g., shock-probe burying) (George et al, 2007). Focal perturbation studies show that nicotine deprivation-induced increases in anxiety-related behaviors and stress-induced reinstatement of nicotine use critically depend on specific molecular (e.g., corticotrophin-releasing hormone, CRH; norepinephrine) signaling mechanisms in the EAc, with overlapping effects evident for other addictive substances (Arakaki & Minami, 2022;Cohen et al, 2015;George et al, 2007;Koob, 2008;Yamada & Bruijnzeel, 2011). Yet the relevance of these tantalizing neurobiological discoveries to the complexities of the human brain and human withdrawal remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among nicotinedependent rodents, acute deprivation is associated with heightened signs of anxiety across a range of threat assays and defensive behaviors (e.g., shock-probe burying) [35]. Focal perturbation studies show that nicotine deprivation-induced increases in anxiety-related behaviors and stress-induced reinstatement of nicotine use critically depend on specific molecular (e.g., corticotrophin-releasing hormone, CRH; norepinephrine) signaling mechanisms in the EAc (Ce/ BST), with overlapping effects evident for other addictive substances [13,[35][36][37][38]]. Yet the relevance of these tantalizing neurobiological discoveries to the complexities of the human brain and human withdrawal remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CPA is often achieved by pairing a drug such as lithium to a compartment ( Cunningham and Niehus, 1993 ; Frisch et al, 1995 ; Longoni et al, 2011 ; Buffalari et al, 2016 ) or delivering a foot shock when the animal is in a specific compartment ( Buffalari et al, 2016 ; Barker et al, 2022 ). CPA is primarily quantified by comparing the time spent in the CS + during the posttest to the time spent in the CS + compartment at pretest ( Longoni et al, 2011 ; Buffalari et al, 2016 ; Arakaki and Minami, 2022 ; Peczely et al, 2022 ; Rezaei et al, 2022 ), but some studies compare the time spent in the CS + compartment to the time spent in the CS – compartment ( Li et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%