The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijms222312956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ-NOP Receptor System in the Regulation of Stress-Related Disorders

Abstract: Nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) is a 17-residue neuropeptide that binds the nociceptin opioid-like receptor (NOP). N/OFQ exhibits nucleotidic and aminoacidics sequence homology with the precursors of other opioid neuropeptides but it does not activate either MOP, KOP or DOP receptors. Furthermore, opioid neuropeptides do not activate the NOP receptor. Generally, activation of N/OFQ system exerts anti-opioids effects, for instance toward opioid-induced reward and analgesia. The NOP receptor is widely expressed t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 263 publications
(419 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were already obtained with the NOP antagonist SB-612111 and with the genetic blockage of the NOP receptor in NOP knockout mice (Holanda et al, 2020(Holanda et al, , 2019. As recently reviewed (Gavioli et al, 2021;Ubaldi et al, 2021), a growing body of evidence suggests that the activation of the N/OFQ -NOP system during stress exposure contributes to the development of depressive-like behaviors (Der-Avakian et al, 2017;Holanda et al, 2019). Under this view, the blockage of the NOP receptor can be proposed as an innovative strategy to increase stress resilience and to prevent depression episodes and stresstriggered diseases in vulnerable subjects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Similar results were already obtained with the NOP antagonist SB-612111 and with the genetic blockage of the NOP receptor in NOP knockout mice (Holanda et al, 2020(Holanda et al, , 2019. As recently reviewed (Gavioli et al, 2021;Ubaldi et al, 2021), a growing body of evidence suggests that the activation of the N/OFQ -NOP system during stress exposure contributes to the development of depressive-like behaviors (Der-Avakian et al, 2017;Holanda et al, 2019). Under this view, the blockage of the NOP receptor can be proposed as an innovative strategy to increase stress resilience and to prevent depression episodes and stresstriggered diseases in vulnerable subjects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The protein encoded by OPRL1 functions as a receptor for the endogenous, opioid-related neuropeptide, nociceptin/orphanin FQ. This peptide is involved in the modulation of stress, addiction, mood, anxiety, obesity, and binge-eating behavior 33 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, PMA significantly upregulated nociceptin at mRNA and protein levels in human monocytic MM6 cells as well as in peripheral blood leukocytes [ 18 , 19 ]. Moreover, solid evidence from preclinical and clinical studies confirms that compounds targeting the nociceptin system are effective therapeutic approaches for substance abuse and potential candidates for pain management [ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ]. Previous studies mainly focused on the role of nociceptin and NOP in neural tissues; much less is known about their functions in blood immune cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, in a rat model of neuropathic pain, TLR2 and TLR4 antagonists produced analgesia and improved the analgesic effects of buprenorphine [ 33 ]. In addition to the well-known dual interaction with mu and kappa opioid receptors [ 38 , 39 ], buprenorphine also seems to be a partial agonist for the nociceptin receptor and antagonist for the delta opioid receptor [ 4 , 29 , 40 , 41 , 42 ]. This suggests that TLRs may indeed play a role in the regulation of endogenous nociceptin during immune response in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%