2011
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m111.244160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Net Charge on Catalytic Domain and Influence of Cell Wall Binding Domain on Bactericidal Activity, Specificity, and Host Range of Phage Lysins

Abstract: Background: Lytic enzymes (lysins) from bacteriophages are potential bactericidal agents. Results: Positive net charge on lysin catalytic domains is a major factor in determining lytic activity and host range. Conclusion: Lysins can be engineered to modify their dependence on their cell wall targeting domains. Significance: This work suggests a number of approaches for fine-tuning lysins as novel antibiotics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
139
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
3
139
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, it could be that the CD27L cell wall binding activity is not fully effective when added externally; since it has evolved to act from inside the cell, it may not be able to access the peptidoglycan or its binding target from the outside due to external structures, such as the extensive array of surface layer proteins. It has been proposed that endolysin C-terminal domains exhibit an inhibitory activity when not bound to the correct target (27,28). Although the presence of the CD27L C-terminal domain did not reduce activity of the CS74L catalytic domain on C. sporogenes, it did have a negative effect on CSCD lytic activity against C. tyrobutyricum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Alternatively, it could be that the CD27L cell wall binding activity is not fully effective when added externally; since it has evolved to act from inside the cell, it may not be able to access the peptidoglycan or its binding target from the outside due to external structures, such as the extensive array of surface layer proteins. It has been proposed that endolysin C-terminal domains exhibit an inhibitory activity when not bound to the correct target (27,28). Although the presence of the CD27L C-terminal domain did not reduce activity of the CS74L catalytic domain on C. sporogenes, it did have a negative effect on CSCD lytic activity against C. tyrobutyricum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…It has been proposed that the cell wall binding domain of endolysin has an inhibitory role when it is not bound to the target (58,62). However, this is not the case for LysPBC1, because the cell wall binding domain of LysPBC1 did not bind several B. cereus group strains (our unpublished data) despite the fact that they were more sensitive to the full-length endolysin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…Intramolecular interaction as the cause of inactivation of endolysin in Bacillus anthracis phage was suggested earlier also (42). However, after performing differential scanning calorimetry experiment that showed no interaction between the catalytic domain and the cell wall binding domain, the hypothesis was discarded (49). Here, we demonstrate by SPR that such an interaction does exist between NTD and CTD of D29 Lysin A. Post-translational modifications have also been suggested to activate lysins in other bacteriophages such as E. coli T4 tail lysozyme, P1 Lyz, and streptococcal bacteriophage C 1 PlyC (50 -52).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%