2020
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of MRI to Assess Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer

Abstract: The goals of imaging after neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer are to monitor the response to therapy and facilitate surgical planning. MRI has been found to be more accurate than mammography, ultrasound, or clinical exam in evaluating treatment response. However, MRI may both overestimate and underestimate residual disease. The accuracy of MRI is dependent on tumor morphology, histology, shrinkage pattern, and molecular subtype. Emerging MRI techniques that combine functional information such as diffusion, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The targeted HER2 + BC treatment regimen and new improved TNBC chemotherapy regimens significantly improved the pathology complete response (pCR) rate. However, the response to preoperative chemotherapy is variable, and complete tumor regression, confirmed by histopathology as pCR, occurs in an average of 19% of patients (range 0.3–50.3%, depending on the immunohistochemical subtype of BC) [ 4 , 5 ]. Approximately 20–30% of BCs remain insensitive to NAC, and chemotherapy delays the necessary surgical treatment, increases the risk of metastasis, and may contribute to side effects [ 3 , 4 , 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The targeted HER2 + BC treatment regimen and new improved TNBC chemotherapy regimens significantly improved the pathology complete response (pCR) rate. However, the response to preoperative chemotherapy is variable, and complete tumor regression, confirmed by histopathology as pCR, occurs in an average of 19% of patients (range 0.3–50.3%, depending on the immunohistochemical subtype of BC) [ 4 , 5 ]. Approximately 20–30% of BCs remain insensitive to NAC, and chemotherapy delays the necessary surgical treatment, increases the risk of metastasis, and may contribute to side effects [ 3 , 4 , 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the response to preoperative chemotherapy is variable, and complete tumor regression, confirmed by histopathology as pCR, occurs in an average of 19% of patients (range 0.3–50.3%, depending on the immunohistochemical subtype of BC) [ 4 , 5 ]. Approximately 20–30% of BCs remain insensitive to NAC, and chemotherapy delays the necessary surgical treatment, increases the risk of metastasis, and may contribute to side effects [ 3 , 4 , 5 ]. In addition, the largest group is that of partial responders, which is significantly heterogeneous, and as a result, the prediction of the precise rate of response is difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, lack of standardisation and susceptibility to artefacts and image distortion remains problematic. When analysed in combination with other parameters measured by MRF, a more accurate evaluation of tumour progression might be achieved [ 92 , 96 ]. With more quantitative information being collected by MRF, personalised medicine and treatment plans can potentially be developed for individual cancer patients [ 97 ].…”
Section: Potential Future Developments For Cancer Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic review demonstrated that MRI-based radiomics achieved overall promising performance in NACT response prediction ( Granzier et al, 2019 ) and residual tumor size evaluation ( Kim et al, 2018a ), while a DCE-MRI-based predictive model achieved better accuracy than a model using other parametric images ( Fowler et al, 2017 ). Radiomics features derived from the pretreatment MRI have been used for predicting response to NACT for breast cancer ( Uematsu et al, 2010 ; Braman et al, 2017 ; Santamaría et al, 2017 ; Reig et al, 2020 ). Our previous study used DCE-MRI to identify and validate predictive imaging biomarkers for NACT using two datasets with different imaging protocols for training and testing ( Fan et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%