2022
DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.943604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of metastasectomy in the management of renal cell carcinoma

Abstract: Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has evolved with the development of a variety of systemic agents; however, these therapies alone rarely lead to a complete response. Complete consolidative surgery with surgical metastasectomy has been associated with improved survival outcomes in well-selected patients in previous reports. No randomized control trial exists to determine the effectiveness of metastasectomy. Therefore, reviewing observational studies is important to best determine which patien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[16,17] To optimize the survival of mRCC patients, precise patient selection predicated on baseline prognostic factors and various aspects of the patient's clinical status, including performance status, age, disease progression, site of metastasis, and therapeutic objectives, is indispensable. [18] The management paradigm for mRCC is undergoing rapid evolution. Options such as cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) and surgical metastasectomy remain viable for a subset of patients.…”
Section: Metastatic Rccmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[16,17] To optimize the survival of mRCC patients, precise patient selection predicated on baseline prognostic factors and various aspects of the patient's clinical status, including performance status, age, disease progression, site of metastasis, and therapeutic objectives, is indispensable. [18] The management paradigm for mRCC is undergoing rapid evolution. Options such as cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) and surgical metastasectomy remain viable for a subset of patients.…”
Section: Metastatic Rccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16,17] To optimize the survival of mRCC patients, precise patient selection predicated on baseline prognostic factors and various aspects of the patient’s clinical status, including performance status, age, disease progression, site of metastasis, and therapeutic objectives, is indispensable. [18]…”
Section: Metastatic Rccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metastasis-directed therapy such as surgery, radiation, or thermal ablation may be considered for select patients on surveillance. 11 Close monitoring for disease progression with regular serial imaging, including bone and CNS imaging, is essential to this approach. The benefit of preserving quality of life (QoL) and delaying or avoiding treatment-related side effects versus the potential for disease progression should be discussed with the patient to incorporate their preferences in the decision-making process.…”
Section: Question: What Are the Preferred Options For First-line Syst...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surgical option, particularly in cases of single-site metastasis among surgically fit patients, is considered to be a valuable and only curative choice in the treatment of mCCRCC, irrespective of the site of the metastasis. Therefore, surgical resection of the metastasis is expected to enhance disease-free survival [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This combination has demonstrated superiority over sunitinib in terms of overall response rate and progression-free survival (PFS). Despite the advances in targeted therapy, achieving a complete response and cure for mCCRCC through systemic treatment alone remains rare [7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%